SMART INVESTING NEWSLETTER
Palantir Technologies, Big Money Managers, Apple’s Stock, Retirement Income Taxation, Early Social Security, High-End Companies, Hospital Stocks, America’s Top CEOs, College Graduates & Investing
Brent Wilsey • May 9, 2025
Why I won’t be buying Palantir technologies anytime soon
When I’m out in public many times people ask me what my opinions are when it comes to investing, the markets or individual stocks. I have to say the one stock that people seem to be asking the most about recently is Palantir Technologies, their ticker symbol is PLTR. I believe I’m asked about this company because investors look at the hype of the past performance and the fact that this stock is up over 1,000% since going public in 2020. That creates excitement for investors, but is it worth buying now? The company currently trades around 60 times next year’s estimated sales, and again that is sales not earnings! That makes it the most expensive stock in the S&P 500. There are signs that growth outside of the US is slowing and I don’t like that they have three unnamed companies that accounted for 17% of the total revenue last year. Usually hype like this goes the same path, which ultimately results in large losses for buyers at this point in the cycle. A more recent example comes from the company Snowflake. In 2021, Snowflake hit an all-time high over $400 per share. Today that stock is down nearly 60% and trades around $167 per share. You don’t hear much about it now, but I remember back in 2021 many people were asking about this company as well. I’m also not thrilled with Palantir’s CEO, Alex Karp, who during an interview just a few months ago had some pretty nasty comments about analysts who don’t agree with him on the stock price. He said “I love the idea of getting a drone and having light fentanyl laced urine spraying on analysts who’ve tried to screw us.” Maybe I’m old school, but I don’t think that is anyway for the CEO of a company of any size to talk about anyone that does not agree with the CEO’s position. Especially considering many times they aren’t knocking the business, just the fact that this company’s valuation is extremely crazy! I will also try my best to refrain from making any comments on Mr. Karp’s hairstyle, but it just seems a little bit outlandish for a CEO to have that type of hairstyle. As far as the stock goes, maybe the craziness will continue and perhaps it does go higher, but if people ask me if they should buy, sell, or hold the stock, I would definitely say sell! I guess I now have to be careful of drones flying above my head that could be spraying fentanyl laced urine on me.
Good news, only 26% of big money managers are bullish
A recent poll from Barron‘s magazine, which they conduct twice a year, found that only 26% of big money managers were bullish and thought stocks would go up while 74% were either neutral or bearish on stocks. They said 32% of respondents were bearish and that was the highest percent since 1997 while the 26% that were bullish marked the lowest reading since 1997. I think Barron’s Magazine is a good source of information, but I was disappointed that they did not list the years of experience of the managers that were being polled. The reason for my concern is that the last big negative in the economy and the market was in 2008, which was 17 years ago. A current manager that graduated school at age 23 would now be 40 years old and they did not experience managing money through 2008. Living through and managing money through a challenge like that provided me with extremely valuable lessons that younger managers would not understand. But why is this negative report a good sign in my opinion? Their current asset allocation is only 64% in equities with 36% in other investments like fixed income and cash. They will not stay bearish forever and if they change direction in the next 6 to 12 months, they will start buying equities again, which will push up prices. If you’re looking for value, the least attractive sectors were energy, real estate, and utilities. I have talked about my concerns around the Magnificent Seven and now only 10% of these managers think the Mag Seven will lead the market over the next six months. Even looking out 12 months only climbed 32% thought the group would lead the market. When asked about the strength of the US dollar going forward 12 months, 68% of the money managers said it will be weaker, which I agree with. Only 15% of the managers think it will be stronger a year from now. These surveys also provide an interesting insight into what other money managers are thinking.
Apple’s stock continues to amaze me
There seems to be so much negative news that continues to come out against Apple, but the stock continues to remain relatively steady given the amount of negativity. We all know about the tariffs and the delayed AI rollout, but I was definitely concerned by a couple announcements that would have large impacts on Apple’s service revenue. This segment has been a bright spot for Apple, but in the most recent quarter it missed expectations and grew at just 11.6% compared to last year. The big concern I have is around Alphabet’s estimated payment of around $20 billion annually to be the default search engine. There is concern if this will hold up given the ruling that Alphabet holds a monopoly and the need for remedies, but also this week Apple executive, Eddy Cue, added additional concerns. He stated the searches in Apple’s Safari browser fell for the first time in April, something that has never happened in 20 years. He then added that the iPhone maker is looking at adding AI search options to the Safari browser. If they did this, would Alphabet really want to keep paying $20 billion a year for that right? I don’t think so! The other major concern that seemed to get little attention was the fact that in a recent ruling a judge ordered Apple to immediately stop imposing commissions on purchases made for iPhone apps through web links inside its apps. This has enabled developers like Amazon and Spotify to update their apps to avoid Apple’s commissions and direct customers to their own website for payments. This commission rate was around 27% for Apple and it could cost Apple billions of dollars annually. All this comes with the fact that Apple still trades around 25x 2026 earnings even though revenue is only estimated to grow low to mid-single digits. In my opinion, Apple really needs some good/exciting news to get this stock moving higher and at this time I don’t see where that is going to come from.
Financial Planning: Breaking Down Retirement Income Taxation
Retirement income varies widely in tax treatment, with some sources being far less tax-friendly than others. In order from worst to best, pension payments and traditional IRA withdrawals are among the least favorable—they're fully taxable as ordinary income at both the federal and state levels. Interest income from bonds, CDs, and savings accounts, as well as annuity earnings from non-retirement accounts, are also taxed as ordinary income at both levels and can trigger the additional 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) if income thresholds are exceeded. Rental income is similarly taxed but allows deductions and depreciation to offset some of the tax burden. Long-term capital gains and qualified dividends receive preferential federal tax rates—as low as 0%—but are still taxed as ordinary income in California and many other states. Social Security is partially taxed at the federal level—between 0% and 85% is included as taxable income depending on total income—but is not taxed in most states, including California, making it relatively tax-favorable. Roth IRA withdrawals are the most tax-friendly, being completely tax-free at both the federal and state levels if qualified. Understanding how each income type is taxed can help guide investment decisions during working years and inform how to structure withdrawals in retirement for optimal tax efficiency.
People claiming early Social Security is up 16%
Americans are getting concerned about their future with Social Security and some are deciding to claim their benefits early rather than wait until their full retirement age when they may collect roughly 76% more than if they started at age 62. The numbers show that last year pending Social Security claims for retirement were 500,527 and as of March 2025 that number has jumped to 580,887, a 16% increase. We continue to tell people you need a good financial planner because maybe it does make sense to take your benefits early but not just because you think Social Security will be cut. This is more of an emotion decision rather than a financial one and the emotions seem to be taking hold of the situation given that a recent Gallup poll revealed that over 75% of US citizens have between a fair amount and a good deal of concern on Social Security, that is a 13 year high. The estimates still show that reserves will be exhausted by 2033 and that would be a reduction in benefits of 21%. What people are not realizing is that you may get your benefits early at a lower amount but a 21% deduction on a lower amount means when the reduction comes you will get less than had you waited and what if the reductions don’t come? If you’re taking early benefits and receiving $1500/month, a 21% cut would reduce your benefit to $1185. If you waited for full benefits and received $1633, the 21% cut would be around $1290 after the reduction so you would still be receiving more after the cut. Keep in mind once you take Social Security you generally cannot stop it. It is never a good idea to make an emotional decision, make sure you or your financial planner do the math to see how long your breakeven point would be when looking at if you should take your benefit early or continue to wait. You should also look at your family history to see if you have longevity. That can make a huge difference in the total amount you’ll receive in your lifetime.
High-end companies with luxury items have a problem
It seems like just a short couple of years ago so many people were buying those high-end purses and watches thinking that the gravy train would continue on forever. Well, here we are in 2025 and your high-end luxury companies are struggling as they face many problems. First and most obvious is they will be hit with the tariffs on products they bring to the United States. Some believe they can just pass those higher costs onto the high-end consumer, but there are others who will forgo putting out that extra money for a high-end purse or shoes. They are also being hit by the increase in the price of gold because if you notice some of the high-end purses like to add gold on the handles or in the purses themselves. With the price of gold over $3300, that has brought up the price of luxury purses as well. Don’t forget that many high-end brands are manufactured in Italy and France and as the dollar has depreciated against other currencies it will take more dollars to purchase the high-end luxury brands. According to consulting firm Bain & Company, they said the number of luxury goods sold between 2022 and 2024 fell more than 20%. With all of these headwinds, I would have to say stay away from buying the high-end luxury brands and not just their products, but also their stocks as well. I think it will be a while before they turn around.
Hospital stocks may be on sale
So far this year, hospital stocks like Tenet Healthcare, Universal Health Services, and HCA Healthcare have had various problems they’ve had to face. One of the big concerns is Medicare spending with companies like Universal Health Services receiving about 45% of EBITDA, which stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, from Medicare supplements. Tenet Healthcare received roughly 25% of their EBITDA from this source and HCA Healthcare received around 18%. With Medicare covering roughly 79,000,000 people and paying out $618 billion last year, there are Republican lawmakers that want to just leave it alone. It will be a tough battle as the current administration has been trying to crack down on fraud. I think there are some opportunities in healthcare companies and hospital chains that are not tied directly or depend heavily on Medicare payments. We could see some cuts in Medicaid, but I’m pretty confident based on what I’ve been reading if there are cuts, they will not be that large. Also, remember the population is getting older and unfortunately, as we become older, we do need more medical attention. I think it could make some sense to put a good quality hospital company in your portfolio.
America’s top CEOs get paid a lot!
Based on the top 100 CEOs in America with revenue over $1billion, the average annual pay is $25,612,208 which is a record high. Before you get all irritated about the big salaries, you should understand that 73% of their pay is in stock awards. Ask yourself this question, if your boss said you’re going to get a 10% raise and it’s going to be all in stock or you can take a 5% cash raise, what would you take? My guess is 90% of people would take the 5% cash raise. This runs counter to CEO pay as more of them are taking more pay in stock as it increased 41% from 2023. The total compensation was up 9.5% from 2023, but that was not as large as the gain from 2022 to 2023 of 11.4%. You may not recognize the highest paid CEO who earned $101.5 million in compensation, his name is James Anderson and he is CEO of Coherent. Before you start thinking about what he would do with $100 million in cash understand that 99.4% of his compensation was in stock. Well-known CEOs you may recognize would be Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, had total compensation of $79.1 million, that was 63% higher than last year. Another name you likely recognize is Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, had total compensation of $74.6 million. Mr. Cook took the most amount of cash pays of the top 100 CEOs with an annual cash compensation of $16.5 million. Maybe he too has some concern on the future of Apple Stock?
What will college graduates face when they graduate in a few weeks?
In a few weeks roughly 700,000 college students will receive either a master’s degree, a bachelor’s degree or an associate’s degree. On the bright side employers expect to hire about the same number of graduates as they did last year. Six months ago, it was predicted that they were going to hire about 7.3% more graduates than in 2024. Depending on what their degree is in it may be easier for some more than others. If students have a degree dealing with software products, energy, manufacturing, healthcare or finance their prospects look much better. On the other hand, if they were looking to get a job in government or policy work, they will not be so lucky. There is a big disconnect between what graduating seniors are expecting with a survey showing that more than 80% expect to be working within three months of graduation. There are 7.2 million jobs open, but employers are a little bit hesitant until we get clarity on what is going on with the trade situation and some employers have found that artificial intelligence can replace some entry-level jobs. If a graduate wants to get a job, they’re really going to have to do something to stand out. Just sending out 100 resumes or applications will probably be very disappointing as it will just get lost in a stack of the hundreds of applications and resumes coming in to the company.
Stocks receive little love as a great place to invest
It always amazes me with the long-term track record for stocks that people still believe they are dangerous investment. Don’t get me wrong they are still volatile, but volatile and dangerous are two totally different things in my mind. Also, if you do stupid things when investing in stocks like chasing popular names to ridiculous valuations, then yes that is risky as well. The reason I bring this up is because in a recent Gallup poll, just 16% of respondents indicated stocks or mutual funds were the best long-term investment. This compares to 37% of respondents that viewed real estate as the best long-term investment and 23% of respondents that said gold was the best investment. This comes even though stocks have averaged 10.29% over the 30-yearperiod the ended in April versus 8.78% for real estate and 7.38% for gold. The interesting thing is this includes two of the most challenging periods for stocks which were the Tech Bust from 2000-2002 and the Great Recession in 2008/2009. In terms of ease of ownership and long term results I still believe stocks are the best way to build long-term wealth!
Retail sales are still surprisingly strong Although the labor market has been softening and consumers say they are worried about inflation, people are still spending money. August retail sales were up 5% compared to last year and if the annual decline of 0.7% in gasoline stations was excluded, sales would have increased 5.5% compared to last August. Strength was broad based in the report and outside of gasoline stations the only other major categories that saw declines were department stores where sales were down 1% and building material & garden equipment & supplies dealers, which fell 2.3%. Non-store retailers continued to be a dominant category as sales climbed 10.1% and food services and drinking places still saw impressive growth of 6.5%. It's because of reports like this that I worry the Fed may make a mistake if they cut rates too quickly. If they overstep, they run the risk of overheating the economy and putting added pressure on inflation. Are quarterly reports necessary for public companies? President Trump floated the idea of switching company reports from quarterly to semiannual. It appears Trump believes this will help companies focus more on the long-term business performance rather than fixating on short-term quarterly numbers. There's also hope this will save time and money for public corporations. The SEC acknowledged they are actively looking into the plan as a spokesperson for the agency stated, "At President Trump’s request, Chairman [Paul] Atkins and the SEC is prioritizing this proposal to further eliminate unnecessary regulatory burdens on companies." Being a long-term investor, I can see the benefits of changing this requirement as one quarter should not dictate your decision on whether you should buy, sell, or hold a business. Ultimately, a change like this wouldn't have a real impact on my investment philosophy and if this enabled companies to focus more on the long term and helps with costs, I would be in favor of giving companies the option to make this switch. In terms of the long-term focus, both Jamie Dimon and Warren Buffett have spoken out against not necessarily the quarterly reports, but the quarterly guidance. In a 2018 op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal, the pair said, “In our experience, quarterly earnings guidance often leads to an unhealthy focus on short-term profits at the expense of long-term strategy, growth and sustainability.” As for the regulatory burden, I'm sure there is hope this would help entice companies to come public. There has been a huge shift in companies staying private longer and I do believe the compliance piece deters some from coming public. I'm sure there are other reasons for staying private, including control and other liquidity avenues that weren't as prominent years ago. Nonetheless, it is concerning that the number of publicly listed companies in the U.S. has fallen from more than 7,000 in 1996 to around 4,000 today. Is your financial advisor "quiet retiring"? You may not completely understand what “quiet retiring” means, but a few years ago, my son Chase and I were on the Dr. Phil Show because they were doing an episode on what they called “quit quitting”. Chase and I were on the pro side for business and working hard, while the other side essentially felt they should still get paid the same amount and not work hard. So, I have coined the phrase, “quiet retiring”. I have been seeing this happen in the financial service industry, especially considering the fact that the average US financial advisor is 56 years old. I have noticed more of them feel they deserve to play more golf or travel more than the average person since they seem to be in retirement mode. They are not telling their clients this and they have their admin staff handle most of the routine details so you, the client, really don’t know that they are not working that much behind the scenes. Hence the term "quiet retiring". Something you definitely should find out is how much your financial advisor is working? Especially if they're in their mid to late 50s because you may not have the person with the most experience watching your investments. This is very important when it comes to preparing for and weathering through difficult times. If your financial advisor is talking about retiring in the near future, be sure to understand fully what the succession plan is and who you will be dealing with. It has now been known in the industry for a few years that the average age of financial advisors is getting older and less younger advisors are coming into the industry. Be sure you understand who your financial advisor really is, who is watching your portfolio and is your investment advisor one of those that is quiet retiring? Understand the risk of low rated bonds Some investors rightly so have started selling some stocks and they are not excited about buying more stocks at this time. As we’ve been saying for quite a while now, we think this is a wise move to sell some stocks that are overpriced, but unfortunately, it seems investors got used to the high returns and they have turned to low rated high-yield bonds. According to JPMorgan Chase, issuance of junk rated bonds and loans hit a monthly record of $240 billion in July. In 2025, $930 billion has been raised through junk bonds and loans. Add that to the over $1 trillion in junk bonds from 2024 and you can see that the risk for investors is starting to increase. Most investors will not buy these individual junk bonds, but they have been plowing money into the high yield mutual funds and exchange traded funds, also known as ETFs. If you dig a little bit deeper, you find some companies are raising money foolishly like a company called TransDigm Group. The company issued nearly a $5 billion high yield bond in August to pay a dividend to their shareholders. We like companies that pay dividends, but it should be from cash flow not from borrowing money that has to be paid back. Business development companies are also back in the news, and these businesses make private loans to small and midsize companies. Over the 12-month period ending in June, private loan activity increased by 33%. I have similar concerns with business development companies and private credit, which I believe will have a crash sometime in the future and cost investors more money than they anticipated. The current default rate on higher yield bonds is 4.7%, which is not bad, but it is not good either. If interest rates on the long end were to increase, which I think is a good possibility the need for debt increases. This could slow the economy and cause some of these smaller companies that have these high-yield loans to default and file bankruptcy, which means investors would lose money. It is nice to get a 10 to 20% return on your portfolio, but sometimes when things are expensive, you have to be conservative and while that may cost you some of the upside, the downside can be a lot nastier than you realize! Financial Planning: Dealing with underwater cars About a quarter of vehicles traded in today carry negative equity, with the average shortfall around $6,500. This happens because cars depreciate quickly, and the trade-in value offered by a dealership is the lowest number you’ll see—less than what you might get in a private sale, and well below the dealer’s eventual resale price. Because of this depreciation, about 40% of financed vehicles on the road carry negative equity. While it’s possible to roll negative equity into a new auto loan, that often creates a deeper hole: you’re financing more than the car is worth, and the new vehicle immediately begins its own depreciation cycle. Lenders may approve the loan, but the higher loan-to-value ratio can lead to higher interest rates or tighter terms. GAP insurance can be used to cover the difference between a car’s actual value and what’s owed in the event of a total loss, but it doesn’t prevent the financial strain of trading in too early, and it comes with an extra cost. With so many vehicles underwater, the safer move for most people is to keep driving the current car until the balance catches up with its value rather than trading in and compounding the problem or bring more cash to the deal, so you don’t have to finance as much. Who will benefit the most from the Federal Reserve rate cut this past week? You may think it is people looking to buy a home, but that is incorrect because mortgage rates generally follow the longer-term 10-year treasury yields rather than overnight rates. Real Estate developers, who borrow on the short term to develop different projects will benefit from the short-term lower rates. Who benefits the most will be the United States government with their massive $37 trillion in debt. This is because they should be able to get a better rate on short term debt issuance. The other concern with the federal debt is roughly 61% will mature in a little over two years. This puts the government in a precarious situation as they will need to determine how to best finance these debt maturities. On the current path, by 2029 the interest the government pays on their debt would be close to 4% of GDP. It is also estimated that on the short term, a one percentage point cut in rates would lower interest costs by 0.51% as a percent of the current GDP. Other than the psychological advantage, the consumer will not benefit much. The reason for that is chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, David Kelly, noted in a research note that the reduction in interest rates reduces household income more than what they save on interest expense. His calculation is that a one percentage point drop in short term rates would be a decline in interest income for household of roughly $140 billion annually in money markets alone. This number does not include all the short-term CDs and T-bills that will come due in the near term at lower rates as well. In 2025 who is performing better gold or Bitcoin? One would think with a higher risk, Bitcoin would be outperforming the more conservative inflation hedge of gold. But that is not the case, year to date gold is up a surprising 39%, which is almost double Bitcoin's gain for the year of 22%. There is still crazy talk of companies like Eightco Holdings that announced a private stock sale and said it plans to use the money to buy Worldcoin, which is a cryptocurrency that is backed by OpenAI founder Sam Altman. I guess that’s more competition in the crypto world for Bitcoin? Bitcoin currently has a market capitalization of around $2.2 trillion, and I was surprised but also disappointed to see that corporate treasuries now hold roughly 6% of the total Bitcoin supply. If you do the math that is roughly $132 billion of Bitcoin. It’s important to note that the aggressive company called Strategy, which used to be MicroStrategy, run by Michael Slayer holds over half of that amount with an estimated value of about $72 billion. I couldn’t resist but take a look at the market capitalization of this company and discovered it’s at $95 billion, not much more than the cryptocurrency it holds. It looks at this point that if you want to hold cryptocurrency, you’re far better off to hold it yourself rather than buy this stock, which had a high this year of $543 and is now down 39% from that peak. On a side note, the company has been denied membership in the S&P 500. I was glad to see that this crazy company got rejected from what should be a more conservative index. If you like going to concerts, you may have interest in investing in StubHub You may enjoy going to concerts and events and feel like you’re spending a lot of money on the tickets through a well-known company called StubHub. In 2024, in the United States total concert and event sales were nearly $430 billion. I’m sure you have thought about how great it would be to get a piece of the action. One possible way is by buying StubHub, ticker symbol STUB, since it is now a public company, but based on some recent information I saw about the business, I would recommend you just spend your money on the tickets, not on the stock. If you ever wondered how much StubHub gets from the fees, it’s around 20% of the total price of the ticket which averaged around $200 last year. That may sound enticing, but competition in the secondary ticket market is coming on strong from companies like Ticketmaster and Live Nation. The Federal Trade Commission is now requiring total fees for tickets to be displayed at purchase to avoid what is known as bait and switch tactics. Even the musical acts themselves are tired of the premiums charged for tickets and some tours have invalidated any tickets that were sold at a premium on the secondary market. The primary ticket market, which is much larger and is around $150 billion annually, is currently dominated by Ticketmaster with a market share of over 50%. StubHub just recently entered this market last year and is hoping to gain share, but once again there’s heavy competition, which is not a good thing for an investor in a business. We don’t like competition because there’s no moat to prevent people or other companies from reducing prices to take some of your market share and reduce or eliminate your profits. It looks like the market may have seen some of these concerns as it was not overly excited by the IPO considering the price action was quite lackluster. The IPO price was $23.50, and the opening trade came in at $25.35. While it did climb as high as $27.89, it actually ended the day below the IPO price at $22. Can the Trump administration fix the housing emergency? Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said the administration may declare a national housing emergency. This may sound very appealing to the roughly 75% of American households that can’t afford a median priced new home, this data is according to a builder's trade group. I would believe those numbers considering we have a housing shortage that started back in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. Since then, 20 million households have been formed, but yet only 18 million new homes have been built. There was a lot of concern from builders that they could get hit hard like they did in the 2008 Great Recession, and they became more hesitant about building too many homes. They didn't want to get stuck with them or have to sell them below their cost. The question is, what could the US government do to help bring down prices? A large portion of the housing prices come from local laws and zoning along with a difficult permit process to build homes. These roadblocks come from local governments and are quite the revenue generator for them. I doubt that they would be willing to give that up to let the federal government control the process. Another problem in many high demand areas such as the Northeast is would they be willing to give up local regulation over control of safety and environmental concerns. I do believe a push in this direction would lead to unfortunately more court challenges that cost more money and tie up our legal system and while an emergency may be announced nothing will likely get done. Will we get more bank mergers? This has been talked about for the past year or so and the number of bank mergers has increased with 118 bank mergers so far this year worth almost $24 billion. In 2024 for the entire year, 126 deals were completed for $16.3 billion. In 2023, only 96 deals were made with a total value of $4.1 billion.1998 was the peak of deal making for banks when 500 deals were completed. There is talk that we could see as much as $100 billion in bank consolidation within the next few years. The table appears to be set for that to happen with the Trump administration reducing many of the stringent merger guidelines and providing a more favorable attitude towards such activity. We also have the prospect of lower short-term rates, which helps in deal making because funding costs are less expensive and at this time we have favorable valuations with potentially higher multiples. Many banks have stronger balance sheets than they did just a few years ago, which allows them to make more deals. With over 4400 banks of different sizes in the US, we have the most banks of any major country around the world, but even that number is down 75% from 1986 when we had over 18,000 banks in the United States. Generally, when a bank acquires another bank, the bank being acquired increases in value. Some potential names that look like they could be absorbed would be Zions Bank Corp. in Salt Lake City, Eagle bank Corp. in Maryland, First Foundation located in Irvine, Texas, and BOK Financial in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Before taking advantage of any of these potential bank takeovers, be sure they have strong fundamentals. You want to make sure that in case a takeover doesn't happen, your investment will give you good dividends and growth in the years to come.
Should members of Congress be allowed to trade stocks? I recently saw there was a bipartisan bill presented in the House that would ban lawmakers from trading individual stocks. I feel like we have been hearing about this for years, and according to NPR, “For more than a decade, a series of bills have been proposed to address such trades, but differences about the details and a lack of support from top congressional leaders stalled past reform efforts.” The question is, will this time be different? The bill made me curious though about how active congress was when it came to trading and let’s just say I couldn’t believe the numbers! In 2022 154 members of Congress made 14,752 trades, in 2023 118 members made 11,491 trades, in 2024 113 members made 9,261 trades, and through July of 2025 108 members made 7,810 trades. That is a crazy amount of activity and I’m not sure how they even have time for that. Their returns were also quite impressive with Democrats producing an average return of 31.1% in 2024 and Republicans producing an average return of 26.1%. For reference, the S&P 500 was up 23.3%. The numbers were quite staggering when you look at the individual performance of some of these politicians. In 2024, Rep. David Rouzer (R-NC) was up 149.0%, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) was up 142.3%, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) was up 123.8%, Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX) was up 111.2% and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) rounded out the top ten with 70.9% return. These are hedge funds that are beating returns in several cases! Personally, I think it is ridiculous that politicians can trade individual stocks, and I hope there is finally action in Congress that ends it! There are risks to Nvidia stock that you may not realize! There is no denying what Nvidia has done has been extremely impressive, but one major problem with the company is the revenue is extremely concentrated. Their top customers made up 23% of total revenue in the recent quarter, which was up from 14% in the same quarter last year. Their second largest customer made up 16% of total revenue, which was up from 11% in the same quarter last year. Sales to four other customers contributed 14%, 11%,11%, and 10% of revenue respectively. This means that six customers accounted for 85% of Nvidia’s total sales. My concern is what if one of them drops out of the AI arms race or if a few of them pull back spending, that could really slow Nvidia’s business. I also believe that China is a risk to Nvidia. While sales have been hindered in the country due to political constraints, I believe many investors are looking to China as an area of potential growth for the company. All I can say to that, is do you really think the Chinese government wants Chinese companies using Nvidia chips? It was reported that Alibaba has recently developed an advanced chip, and I’d assume Huawei and other Chinese companies are racing to compete against Nvidia. While Nvidia stock essentially just keeps climbing, it’s important to realize there are several risks that could take the stock down! Understanding more about AI and why it's becoming more expensive We are no expert on artificial intelligence, but we have learned that while AI has gotten smarter it has also gotten more expensive. It is now broken down into a unit of AI which is known as a token and while the price of tokens continues to drop, the number of tokens needed to accomplish a task is increasing dramatically. There are two basic attributes to AI, one is called training, and the other is AI inference. The increase in cost is coming from the training side that has to use large models and demands even more costly processing. AI applications are using so-called reasoning and new forms of AI double check queries on their answers, which may include scanning the entire Web. Sometimes they write their own programs to calculate things all before releasing an answer that may only be a short sentence. Delivering meaningful and better responses takes a lot more tokens to complete that process. Looking at examples, basic chatbot Q&A requires 50 to 500 tokens. Short document summaries can be used anywhere from 200 tokens to 6000 tokens. Lawyers and paralegals who use legal document analysis require 5,000 to 250,000 tokens. If one is trying to do multi-step agent workflows, well now you’re looking at 100,000 to over 1 million tokens. Please understand when we talk tokens we’re not talking about anything that has to do with cryptocurrencies, and this is a different token pertaining to AI. Some big companies are spending $100 billion a year or more to create cutting-edge AI models and building out their infrastructure. However, for all that investment there needs to be a return on investment, and businesses and individuals will eventually have to pay more for artificial intelligence. The CFO of Open AI said last October that 75% of the company’s revenue comes from your average person paying $20 a month. Currently the cheapest AI models, which includes Open AI‘s new ChatGPT – 5 nano is costing around $.10 per million tokens but go to the top-of-the-line GPT -5 and that costs about $3.44 per million tokens. What they are trying to figure out is what the consumer will pay for AI. There is also concern about how long the big giants can keep up this spending when they’re competing with their own Financial Planning: 529 Withdrawal Pitfalls A 529 plan is a tax-advantaged savings account designed to help families pay for education costs, with contributions growing tax-deferred and withdrawals tax-free when used for “qualified education expenses” such as college tuition, fees, books, and room and board. A qualified withdrawal avoids taxes and penalties, while a non-qualified withdrawal means the earnings portion (not contributions) is subject to federal and state income tax plus a 10% federal penalty. The IRS also allows up to $10,000 per year, or $20,000 in 2026, per student for K–12 tuition, and under the One Big Beautiful Bill signed on July 4, 2025, Congress expanded 529 qualified expenses to include not just K–12 tuition, but also fees, books, and required supplies for primary and secondary education. However, California does not conform to this expansion and continues to treat K–12 withdrawals of any kind as non-qualified, taxing the earnings and applying a 2.5% state penalty. This mismatch means California families using 529 funds for K–12 costs may face unexpected taxes and penalties despite the new federal flexibility. Keep this in mind if you are considering funding a 529 plan. Should you buy the new iPhone or work with what you have? On Tuesday, September 9th, Apple launched their new iPhone and while there was a lot of excitement around the event, I just don't see what's exciting about the limited changes. If you are excited about the new features though and if you’re a techie, you probably want to get the new iPhone just to brag about it. But if you want to be financially smart, you need to think about maybe you really don’t need a new phone. The new iPhone 17 is supposed to be the best ever, which is of course what they are going to say. The cost of the new iPhone 17 is expected to be between $800-$1200. If your phone is seven years or older, you may start running into problems with updates, which could include security fixes and updated software. Apple may not support your phone so maybe it would be wise to buy a new one. Your phone may be feeling slow or short on battery life, but there are repairs that can correct that situation for you and are far cheaper than buying a new phone. Repairs could be anywhere between $100-$350 and be sure to check out a good independent shop but be aware they may use third party aftermarket parts. You may be thinking, "what’s the big deal? It’s only $800" but it’s important to remember that a few hundred dollars here and a few hundred dollars there adds up and before you know it, you're way over your monthly budget. Also, think about what you’re saving on repairing your phone versus getting a new one. That is money that you can put away into your emergency fund or hopefully invest it for long-term growth to increase your net worth. Think about how it will grow over time and when invested properly, you’ll be very happy that you didn’t waste that few hundred dollars extra on a new iPhone. It will be interesting to see how "different" the new model really is! Here’s another indicator showing how overpriced the S&P 500 is! There are four main valuations used when valuing a public company or a stock. The most common one is what investors are paying for the earnings, that is known as a price to earnings ratio. Another one that is fairly well known is price to book value, which looks at how much you are paying for the assets, minus the liabilities of a company. The price of cash flow is not as well known, but we believe that cash flow is very important for businesses and like the other ratios, we don’t want to overpay for it. The last one that has been around for many years is the price to sales. This can be one of the best indicators because unlike price to earnings, there’s no way for a company to pad or manipulate the sales, they are what they are. As of now the S&P 500 is trading at 3.23 times sales, which is an all-time record high. When it comes to the price to earnings, the ratio is also high at 22.5 times projected earnings. While this is not a record, it is well above the average of 16.8 over the last 25 years. Some people are ignoring the valuations saying that the companies are worth these higher values, but as I said they are well above historical averages. The other problem is many of these popular names pushing the indexes higher are crowded trades and it seems like everyone is in those stocks. The problem is, if almost everyone is in those stocks and there is a pullback for any reason, there are not many people that have extra capital to step in and buy more. We have also talked about margin hitting a record high of $1 trillion and the problem here is if people have margin on their accounts, they could be hit with margin calls perhaps taking away what little cash they had left or they could be forced to sell out of the stock, which would create more downward pressure. No one knows what will cause the bad news for a fall, but it will likely come out of left field. That could then lower future expectations and that is when valuations will matter. The decline could be larger than people realize. It’s always important to understand what you are paying when you are buying stocks. Remember they’re not gambling chips; they are small pieces of large companies that trade based on valuations. Does the BLS need to change the way they calculate the job numbers? While we know the labor market has been softening, I was quite surprised to see annual revisions to nonfarm payrolls data for the year prior to March 2025 showed a drop of 911,000 from the initial estimate. This is a huge change considering the average pace of seasonally adjusted employment gains went from 147,000 jobs a month over the period to a bit over 70,000! This means instead of adding about 1.8 million positions as originally reported, the U.S. economy created just 847,000 jobs. It also marked the largest preliminary revision on record going back to 2000 and when looking at it as a percentage of total jobs lost the revision represents the largest since 2009. To be clear, while this is troubling, this is not the final revision, and it is just the preliminary part of an annual process in which the BLS updates the job figures from its monthly employer survey using more comprehensive data from state unemployment tax records. The official revision will come in February, and large changes can still occur. As an example, last year's August revision of negative 818,000 was revised to a final reading of negative 598,000 in February of this year. With how much technology has changed, I would expect these monthly reports would get more accurate over time, not less. Maybe instead of relying on a survey of about 121,000 employers there is a better way to get this data? The BLS pointed out that the revisions were so large because businesses within its survey reported higher employment in its survey than they did in their quarterly tax reports and that businesses that responded to its survey had stronger employment than those that had been selected for the survey but didn’t respond. While this all may seem extremely troubling, I have continued to question how payroll gains could be so large without a good pool of people to fill those jobs. I still believe that though the labor market has softened more than we initially thought, I still believe the economy is in an alright spot considering the unemployment rate remains historically low. Does the de minimis rule affect you? You may have never heard of this rule before and if you’ve been buying packages online that were less than $800, you probably didn’t realize that they could enter the US tariff free. Well, that has now changed, and you may have to pay tariffs on that small package depending on the country of origin and the type of product it is. It also is important to know how the product was delivered, did it come through a post office or a commercial carrier like UPS or Federal Express. If you buy small items overseas such things as fishing poles, pens, or small statues, and even some types of shoes, you may have to pay additional tariffs when your package arrives. It’s a little bit unclear about who and when the tariff will have to be paid. It is possible that you could receive a package from UPS and when they come to your door, you may be asked to pay the tariff right then and there. Whether you knew about it or not. You will have the right to refuse the package. When you are shopping online, you should look on the seller's website closely to see who is responsible for paying the tariff and when. The tariff can be very high if you’re buying yoga pants from Vietnam at $98 a pair, your tariff would be 56% or about $55. Expecting a child and you found a great stroller online coming from China for $399. Be prepared to pay over $540 because of the 36% tariff. If you’re trying to stay healthy and found some great deals on nutritional supplements from Canada that were only $37, by the time you pay the tariff of 63% you’ll be paying $60 for those nutritional supplements. Inflation reports likely cements Fed rate cut next week The Consumer Price Index, also known as CPI, showed August headline prices rose by 2.9% compared to last year and core prices, which exclude food and energy, saw an increase of 3.1%. Both readings were essentially in line with market expectations. Annual core price inflation was essentially in line with last month's reading, but the headline did climb from an annual rate of 2.7% in July and the August number marked the highest reading since January. This was largely due to the fact that food prices rose 3.2% compared to last year and energy is no longer providing the same benefit it did earlier in the year. Energy has largely seen deflation this year, but in August there was an annual increase of 0.2%. Gasoline was down 6.6% compared to last year, but electricity prices increased 6.6% and utility gas service rose 13.8%. What I would consider is that tariff impacted products are still surprisingly seeing little change. Apparel was up 0.2% compared to last year and new vehicles only saw an increase of 0.7%. I was surprised to see prices for used cars and trucks increase 6% though. As I've said for many months now, shelter continues to provide a large headwind in the inflation report as prices climbed 3.6%, but the positive here is it has been steadily declining, and it is well off the recent peak around 8% at the beginning of 2023. We also got the Producer Price Index, also known as PPI, earlier in the week and that came in largely better than expected. Headline prices showed an increase of 2.6% compared to last year and core prices climbed by 2.8%. Looking at all the inflation data from this past week, I wouldn't say it was overly impressive, but I believe it does enough for the Fed to justify starting rate cuts considering the concerns that are being discussed around the labor market. Is Elon Musk worth $1 trillion? Tesla is asking shareholders to approve another huge pay package for Elon Musk. Based on the maximum payout assuming the share count remains, the total package would be worth $975 billion. Looking at the details, it is quite ambitious so I'd say if he ends up hitting these targets maybe he would be worth that amount. Operational milestones for the award include: 20 million Tesla vehicles delivered, 10 million active FSD Subscriptions, 1 million robots delivered, 1 million Robotaxis in commercial operation and a series of adjusted EBITDA benchmarks. The more challenging milestones revolve around the market cap of the company. These milestones are separated into 12 tranches with the first benefit coming at a market cap of $2 trillion and the final benchmark coming at a market cap of $8.5 trillion. I believe to achieve these lofty goals Telsa will have to execute on both Robotaxis and their Optimus robot. In the past Elon has said he believes Optimus can make Tesla a $25 trillion company and he recently said roughly 80% of Tesla’s value could eventually come from Optimus. These goals would be needed as I believe the car business will not be enough to get him to even a $2 trillion market cap, especially considering the problems they are having with slumping sales and declining market share. It was just reported the Telsa accounted for just 38% of total US EV sales in the month of August. This was the first time its market share has fallen below 40% since October 2017 and it is well off the records it had over 80% just a few years ago. From an investment perspective, Elon has proven me wrong before, but this stock is definitely one of the highest risks/speculative bets that investors can make. For me it's more like gambling and while it's entertaining to watch what Elon says and does, I wouldn't touch the stock.
You don’t always need to pick the hot technology stocks to get great returns Investing is very emotional and it’s always nice to be part of the crowd and buy the hot stocks like Apple, Alphabet and Amazon, but they are not always the top performers. Sometimes your boring, undervalued companies can do very well. As an example, Apple over the years has performed nicely, but over the last five years the gain was 114%. Not a bad return, but if you held a boring company like Tractor Supply over the same five years, you would have a gain of 119%. Even an old insurance company like Allstate over the last five years was up 115%. Five years ago, if you saw the value in a company called Tapestry, which owns Coach and Kate Spade, your return was over 545%. Apple's not the only big tech company that was surpassed by these boring companies. If you look at Amazon over the last five years, you’ll see a return of only 49%. One other area that is often discounted is that many of your boring companies are also paying dividends and generating cash flow that can be used to purchase other equities on sale. You may be thinking Apple does pay at dividend but it's important to note the yield is only 0.45%. Sometimes being boring is good and not being so concentrated in the hot stocks can pay off in the long run. I especially think this will be the case as we look out over the next 5-10 years! Another weak job report likely solidifies a Fed rate cut August non-farm payrolls increased by just 22,000, which was well below the estimate of 75,000. This weak report also comes with another month of negative revisions as employment in June and July combined is 21,000 lower than previously reported. Healthcare and social assistance continued to lift the headline number as the sectors added 31k and 16k jobs respectively. Many other areas in the report actually saw declines with payrolls in construction falling 7,000, manufacturing declining 12,000, and professional and business services dropping 17,000. Government also saw a decline of 16,000 jobs and I worry this is a ticking time bomb since employees on paid leave or receiving ongoing severance pay are counted as employed in the establishment survey and those that opted to take the government’s offer at the beginning of the year will start coming off severance pay as the deal lasted through September. The most recent data I saw was that 75,000 federal employees took the offer, but not all were accepted into the program. I guess we will see the actual data and its impact over the next couple of months. With the weakness, I was surprised to see leisure and hospitality produce a gain of 28,000 jobs in the month. While much of this sounds concerning, the unemployment rate held relatively steady at 4.3% and that doesn’t incorporate the fact that 1.9 million or 25.7% of all unemployed people were jobless for 27 weeks or more. My belief is that many of those that have been unemployed that long are skewing the data as I can’t imagine they have been looking for a job that hard. With the unemployment rate low and deportations potentially weighing on the supply of workers, I just don’t see how it would be possible to maintain strong job growth given the limited supply. Because of this I still don’t remain overly concerned by the weak showing. Even with my lack of concern, this will likely lead to a Fed rate cut this month with markets now essentially putting odds for a 25-basis point cut at 100% and even a 50-basis point cut is now on the table with markets putting those odds at 12% after the job print. That’s up from a zero percent chance on Thursday. Should you panic over the job opening data? The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed job openings fell to 7.18 million in the month of July. This was below the estimate of 7.4 million and also marked the lowest reading since September 2024. It was only the second time since the end of 2020 that job openings came in below 7.2 million. While this may sound troubling, I believe it just illustrates how crazy the labor market got after Covid. If we look at job openings before 2020, nearly 7.2 million openings would have been a great number. In 2016, job openings averaged 5.86 million; in 2017, job openings averaged 6.12 million; in 2018, job openings averaged 7.11 million; and in 2019, job openings averaged 7.15 million. So, while the headline may sound troubling, I still believe we could have job openings fall into the low 6 million range and it wouldn't be problematic, especially given the fact that unemployment remains extremely low. Even with that, I do believe the Fed will use this as further evidence of a softening labor market and that will give them the excuse to cut rates at the meeting this month. I'm still not convinced that is the right move, but we did hear from Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who is supposedly on the short list to replace Powell as Fed chair, that he believes there should be multiple cuts over the next few months, saying interest rates today are perhaps 1.0 to 1.5 percentage points above their “neutral” level. American luxury brands are destroying Europe’s luxury brands It appears that European luxury brands like Gucci, Hermes and LVMH have increased their prices beyond what the average consumer is willing to pay. Currently, American consumers are spending the lowest share of discretionary income on luxury goods since 2019. The European luxury brands seem to have their heads in the clouds thinking American consumers would pay any price for a luxury purse from Europe. I think they have now discovered that the American consumer has reached their limit. Two luxury American brands have benefited from the ignorance of the European luxury brands. Both Ralph Lauren and Tapestry, which owns Coach and Kate Spade, have seen their sales increase. A chart of these luxury brands stocks shows European brands dropping while American brands have been increasing. One may be thinking now is the time to step in and buy Tapestry or Ralph Lauren, but with the recent stock increase they are no longer a great value as Ralph Lauren trades at over 20 times forward earnings and Tapestry is now over 19 times forward earnings. I would take a different side of the coin as I believe investors should understand that the European luxury brands will likely not just sit on their hands and do nothing and they will likely try and win back market share. With the increase in prices over the years I’m sure the profit margins are very fat, and they may have a good amount of space to do some heavy discounts to get their market share back. Both Tapestry and Ralph Lauren are dealing with the current tariff situation and that could hurt their profit margins going forward as well. On a side note, in years past we have warned people paying the high prices for European purses that they would not appreciate as much if at all. I have not researched it, but I feel pretty confident that if sales are down as much as they are, the resale on those expensive purses has probably dropped as well. Financial Planning: Mortgage rates reach 2025 low Mortgage rates have fallen to their lowest level of the year, reaching levels not seen since last October. Throughout 2025, 30-year mortgage rates have fluctuated between 6.5% and 7%, and as of Friday, September 5, they dipped as low as 6.29%. While this presents an opportunity for buyers and homeowners considering a refinance, caution is warranted. Rates are still likely to experience volatility even as the broader declining trend continues over the next several years. In 2024, mortgage rates actually rose at year-end despite the Federal Reserve implementing three rate cuts. In 2025, it is widely expected that the Fed will cut again in September, with additional cuts likely by year-end. This current window of lower rates may be worth taking advantage of, but paying upfront points may not be wise just yet, as there will likely be future opportunities to capture even lower rates. Warren Buffett’s Kraft Heinz deal is coming apart after 10 years! Not everything Warren Buffett does turns gold and he readily admits that he does have mistakes. In 2015 he and a Brazilian private equity firm called 3G Capital had the idea to merge Kraft and Heinz, which they expected to do very well. Over the last 10 years, the stock has struggled though as it is down over 60%. It currently has a nice dividend yield of 5.7%, which helps reduce the loss, but needless to say investors have not been happy with the results from the combined entity. Kraft has been putting more into its faster growing businesses such as hot sauces, dressings and condiments, which consumers have increased their spending on. However, the other part of the business, which includes processed foods like lunch, meats and cheeses, has been in decline over the years. The announced split will create two new companies that are not currently named, and the hope is that the two companies will be worth more than the current $30ish billion market value. One company will primarily include shelf-stable meals and will be home to brands such as Heinz, Philadelphia and Kraft mac and cheese. This part of the business accounted for $15.4 billion in 2024 net sales, and approximately 75% of those sales came from sauces, spreads and seasonings. The second company would according to Kraft, be a “scaled portfolio of North America staples” and would include items such as Oscar Mayer, Kraft singles and Lunchables. That company would have had approximately $10.4 billion in 2024 net sales. Executive chair of the board, Miguel Patricio said, “Kraft Heinz’s brands are iconic and beloved, but the complexity of our current structure makes it challenging to allocate capital effectively, prioritize initiatives and drive scale in our most promising areas. By separating into two companies, we can allocate the right level of attention and resources to unlock the potential of each brand to drive better performance and the creation of long-term shareholder value.” Although this deal isn't expected to close until the second half of 2026, Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathway have said they are disappointed by the announcement. This is important considering the fact that Berkshire remains the largest shareholder with a 27.5% stake in the company. The question is, could his disappointment lead to the selling of shares? While Buffett may not like it, there have been other successful recent splits like Kellogg and General Electric. Keurig Dr Pepper is also unwinding their 2018 transaction, but it is still unknown if that will be another success story. One reason businesses will acquire another company is to try to diversify their business and enhance the earnings going forward. Unfortunately, sometimes the opposite happens, and it creates more complexity that leads to business struggles and a suffering stock price. Normally, when the split is announced, the stock will increase in value as investors see the opportunity for more value, but that was not the case with Kraft as it looks like Buffett's disapproval created a large overhang and resulted in a stock price that fell more than 7% after the announcement. Would you fly with an airline that filed bankruptcy twice in one year? The airline I’m talking about is Spirit Airlines, which filed for bankruptcy in November 2024 and came out of bankruptcy in March of this year. It exchanged almost $800 million of corporate debt into equity. The executive team from Spirit is now saying they should’ve renegotiated the expensive leases they had before, and they still have over $2 billion in debt on their balance sheet. The management team also blames the airline market. They estimated that the discount airspace would rebound for them, but it did not. Your bigger airlines like United, Delta and American do have less expensive basic economy tickets, but they also have more profitable sales from premium seats and destinations around the world. Spirit seems to think that maybe management from Frontier Airlines will maybe pick them up even though they had no interest before. They also feel that maybe another airline will be interested. We will see stranger things have happened, but I know as a consumer I would not want to buy any tickets from Spirit Airlines that go out more than a few weeks because you could be holding a ticket that is worthless from a bankrupt airline. Water shortages around the globe sound scary, could it reduce meat and dairy production? It is rather scary that based on a report from the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, in just five years the demand for freshwater is set to exceed supply by 40%. Meat and dairy farms use water to hydrate their animals, grow crops to feed them and when the heat gets high, they use water to cool them off. The American Farm Bureau Federation says that farmers need to work on reducing the water consumption by up to 40% by getting moisture directly to each plant using drip irrigation. The reason why watering plants is so important is if there’s not enough water to grow the crops, then the farms and businesses will have to buy more feed, which is more expensive and would add to the cost of meat and dairy production. The American Farm Bureau Federation is hopeful that advancements in humidity sensing technology will help farmers understand how much each plant needs down to the last drop. Once again, technology will probably save consumers a lot of money going forward by helping farmers become more efficient in raising crops and animals.
Yet another warning on private investments! I remember hearing about a company by the name of Yieldstreet a few years ago and how it was a new way for smaller investors to get access to private investments and diversify away from stocks. The company promoted their platform with the tagline, “Invest like the 1%.” Unfortunately, it is now coming out that several investors may have lost everything they invested in the platform. One gentleman shared with CNBC how he invested $400,000 in two real estate projects: A luxury apartment building in downtown Nashville overseen by former WeWork CEO Adam Neumann’s family office, and a three-building renovation in the Chelsea neighborhood of New York. Each project had targeted annual returns of around 20%. After three years, Yieldstreet declared the Nashville project a total loss, which wiped out $300k of his funds and the Chelsea deal needs to raise fresh capital or it will face a similar fate. Unfortunately, he is not alone and CNBC reviewed documents that show investors put more than $370 million into 30 real estate projects that have already recognized $78 million in defaults in the past year. Yieldstreet customers who spoke to CNBC say they anticipate deep or total losses on the remainder. Looking into this platform in more detail, it’s crazy what they were doing. Their portfolio doesn’t just consist of real estate as there is also private equity, private credit, art, crypto, and other less common investments. It appears Yieldstreet makes money by charging a management fee of around 2% on invested funds. The craziest part to me though was in several cases, Yieldstreet went to its userbase to raise rescue funds for troubled deals and told members the loans combined the protections of debt with the upside of equity. But in one case, a $3.1 million member loan to rescue a Nashville project was wiped out after just a few months! One of the big problems with these platforms is professional large investors are more disciplined when looking at investing in this space and the smaller players may be getting the bad deals that are passed over by the more established players. It’s unfortunate to see people lose money like this, but this is why I avoid the private investment space. There is just not enough clarity and in many cases these platforms seem to be in it for themselves rather than for their investors. I will continue to invest in good, quality equities as I worry, we will continue to hear stories like this from investors who put money into private investments thinking they were investing in a safer asset, just to find out years later there is nothing left. Will tariffs hurt this holiday season? Here we are already at the end of August and before you know it, you’ll be thinking about putting out the Christmas lights and decorating your home. For the past few years, we have seen growth in holiday sales, but this year could be different as it appears from recent conference calls from CEOs at Walmart, Home Depot and Target that they are seeing the tariff increases starting to come through. During his recent conference call, the CEO of Walmart, Doug McMillon, said that the impact of tariffs has been gradually increasing to protect the consumer, but he also said that the company is seeing cost increases each week as it rebuilds inventories with new products post tariff. He also mentioned that they may not be able to protect the consumer from rising prices much longer. What is also bad about this is that retail sales may rise, but consumers will receive less product to put under the Christmas tree considering sales are not adjusted for inflation. This could be the delayed inflation that Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve has been waiting for and unfortunately, it may show up when people begin shopping for Christmas gifts. Maybe there should not be an interest rate cut in September after all? Should you work in retirement? When many people are in their working years, they can’t wait to retire so they can do what they want to do. For some people that retirement works out well, but science has shown that there’s health benefits to working in retirement along with financial benefits. The health benefits would include more physical activity as you’re not laying around the house or sitting in the rocking chair on the front porch. Instead, you’re moving around walking places and staying active. Working also helps you stay connected with other people, which has been proven to extend your life. The financial benefits from working in your later years would include taking out less from your retirement accounts to maintain a good lifestyle. Also, you can hold off on Social Security which means you’d get a larger Social Security check when you do decide to collect. The type of work you do depend on you and some people in retirement have started a second career that is a job that they always wanted to do. Some people just work part time to stay active and involved. If you’re in retirement, you can take a low stress job because you don’t really need all the income to cover your expenses as long as you have the financial accounts/investments to do so. Financial Planning: The challenge of creating retirement income For decades, American workers relied on pensions, but today retirement security largely depends on defined contribution plans like the 401(k), where the burden has shifted to the individual saver. The real challenge comes when it is time to turn a pile of assets into a reliable, inflation-adjusted income stream that can last 20–30 years. Some retirees look to CDs and Treasury bills, which are guaranteed and currently pay about 4% interest, but they offer no appreciation to offset inflation and yields will likely decline as short-term rates drop. Corporate bonds may provide a slightly higher return, but they come with interest rate, credit, duration, and reinvestment risks that often outweigh the modest extra yield. Others consider annuities, which can create a pension-like income stream, but these require handing over principal, and because they are designed by insurance companies, the terms typically favor the provider rather than the investor. High-dividend stocks can also be appealing, but they may be a trap, as struggling companies often have elevated yields due to falling stock prices, which can be compounded further if the dividend is cut. On the other end of the spectrum, broad market indexes like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq have been popular for growth, but their dividend yields remain low, around 1.2% and 0.8% respectively, forcing investors to sell shares for income, and poorly timed sales can shorten portfolio longevity. Even dividend aristocrats, known for steadily increasing payouts, currently only yield about 2% to 2.5% on average. There is no simple solution, but one truth stands out: accumulating assets is very different than generating income from them. Retirees need a clear income plan before leaving the workforce in order to maximize both security and enjoyment in retirement. Why Bitcoin could never be a world currency One of the reasons that Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies increase in value is because of the thought that they will become a world currency someday. Let me explain one of the many reasons why that will not happen. As an example, let’s take a look at the Euro and how difficult it was to get the European countries to adapt to just one currency and let’s not forget about Brexit, where Great Britain dropped out of the European Union and the Euro? Think about this, the European Union is just 27 countries but there’s 195 countries in the world. There are many different income gaps, difference cultures and let’s not even talk about the differences of opinion on politics. There is currently an attempt at a global currency of sort known as the International Monetary Fund, better known as the IMF, which introduced the SDR, which are special drawing rights. There is problems with this already where it requires the United States to re-dominate its treasury bills into SDRs for any foreign central bank that asks and make a legally binding international agreement to reduce the US deficit whenever it is deemed excessive or to increase it whenever it is deemed insufficient. That’s what will put an end to the SDR‘s before it gets very far. What large government would want to be controlled by the world let alone have no control over a currency like Bitcoin? Who benefits from private investments in your 401(k), not you! I keep seeing more and more of a push to allow private investments in credit, equity and real estate into your 401(k). Let me give you a list of who the big benefactors are if private investments are allowed in your 401(k) and yes, it is the big fat cats on Wall Street. There are six main players: Apollo Global, KKR, Carlyle Group, Blackstone, Ares and Blue Owl Capital. These companies rake in high fees with Morningstar estimating them around 2.5% on average. I was disappointed on August 7th when President Trump signed an executive order that instructed the Department of Labor and the Securities and Exchange Commission to make it easier for company plans to offer private assets. A spoke person from the White House, Taylor Rogers, said the intent of the order is to reduce the regulatory burdens and litigation risk that impede American workers from achieving a competitive return. Considering the return for equities of the last several decades, I believe nothing could be further from the truth when looking at that statement. On August 12th, the Department of Labor rescinded a Biden era statement that said most companies are not likely suitable to evaluate the use of private equity investments. It’s a shame that has been reversed because most the business owners that I know don’t have the time to analyze investments enough to make decisions to allow them in the 401(k). Ultimately, employers have a fiduciary responsibility to their employees to make sure their retirement is safe and I worry if employers get to loose in allowing these into 401k plans, they could open themselves up to lawsuits down the road. There is hope as there’s an advocacy group called Americans for Financial Reform that says without strong guardrails, ordinary savers will pay the price of diminished resources in retirement and will more than likely be left holding the bag with these expensive private investments. I do hope the Department of Labor is opposed to making a quick issue on guidance and hopefully they will take their time in drafting formal rules. This could take months and after that it could take employers years to do the due diligence on these investments. Hopefully by that time, people will come to their senses as we may see another liquidity crunch like the Blackstone BREIT had in 2022 and 2023 or even potentially a collapse in some of the popular private investment funds. Why is the union trying to get into JPMorgan Chase? I would not have believed it unless I read it myself but yes, there’s a union called JPMC Workers Alliance that is trying to unionize the 300,000 employees at the big bank. I see no benefit at all for the employees and instead see it as more of a fee generator for the unions to collect union dues. It is doubtful this will go anywhere since employees overall are very happy at the bank and view it as a great place to work with good work/life balance and opportunities for advancement. The union‘s big gripe is in January all employees were required to go back to the office five days a week. The United States finance industry has the least amount of unions of any private industry. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unions in the financial industry for the US is less than one percent at 0.8%. There are currently about 200 people that formed a private group about unionizing, but they have a long way to go to get the union into JP Morgan Chase. Well known CEO, Jamie Dimon, is defending his five-day work week in the office saying that when you work from home it is hurtful to younger generations and that virtual meetings are really nothing more than a bunch of distracted colleagues. He has said before, that before the return to office change, on Fridays he couldn’t get a hold of people by phone. It seems people these days feel like they deserve the freedom to choose when and for how long they are in the office. I don’t know where some of these people in their group get their information, but I’m sure many of them have never run a business. I know myself; I can’t count the number of times I needed to go to one of my employees in the office to speak about something right then and there and many times needed to actually see what they had. Waymo’s autonomous taxi services will now be available in New York City Waymo, which is owned by Alphabet, received approval to test up to eight autonomous vehicles in Manhattan and Brooklyn through late September, but at this time they are required to have a trained AV specialist behind the wheel at all times. If you’ve been to Phoenix, San Francisco, or Los Angeles, you may have seen these weird looking vehicles scooting around the streets. Waymo has now completed over 10 million rides in five major US cities and they claim to have a very strong safety record. New York City is not the end or the last city for Waymo as the company did say earlier this year, they plan on being in 10 new cities, which includes Las Vegas and San Diego. It seems we’re getting closer and closer to having autonomous driving taxis as a more normalized option. If you have not done so already, you may soon be getting into a car and there will be no one in the front seat. That will be kind of weird don’t you agree? Ivy League schools don’t appear to be the best investors You may beat yourself up over some investment you did that lost money. That investment may have been sold to you because of no market fluctuation and it sounded like a great idea. It appears the Ivy League endowment funds are pretty much in the same boat. Because of the excitement around private investments, endowments are really short on liquidity if they need money. Endowment funds have been moving sometimes over 50% of an endowment into non-liquid investments like private equity, private real estate, and private credit. Maybe the managers are younger and forgot about the 2008 Great Recession and how important it was to have liquid investments in the portfolio. They have really gotten away from the standard portfolio of 60% stocks and 40% bonds, which has brought investors a decent return in the long term. In fiscal year 2024, the National Association of College and University Business Officers revealed that endowments with over $5 billion in assets only held 2% in cash or money markets, 6% in bonds, 8% in US stocks and 16% in international stocks. If you do the math, you’ll see that only 32% of the portfolio was liquid, which means the other 68% was in non-liquid assets. Because of the investments in non-liquid assets, the endowments have had to borrow money to pay obligations. Brown with a $7.2 billion endowment borrowed $300 million in April and $500 million in July. Northwestern borrowed $500 million and Harvard borrowed $750 million in April. Also, in the spring of 2025 Harvard had to sell $1 billion of private equity funds at a 7% discount to the stated value. If the economy does hit a slow period or a recession, it could really wreak havoc on these endowment funds. I would say, don’t invest like the Ivy League funds, instead find good quality equities that are trading at reasonable prices and that pay nice dividends. I believe you’ll be far better off than the Ivy League folks. Europe is far behind in their economy 500 years ago, European nations conquered and ran as much as 80% of the planet. They shaped the globe as their wars killed millions of people and surprisingly it was the birth place of modern capitalism and the industrial revolution. Over the last 15 years though, their economy has essentially been treading water. Their share of the global economic output was 33% 20 years ago and as of 2024 it was only 23%. It is estimated to be their lowest portion of the global economy since the Middle Ages. Household wealth growth has also been a problem for Europe as it has grown by a third as much as Americans since 2009. Per capita GDP in the US is about $86,000 a year versus $56,000 a year for Germany and only $53,000 for the UK. You may think Europe is a great place to live, but Americans have a far higher standard of living. Here in the United States, we have over 50% more living space on average per person and four out of five Americans have air conditioning and clothes dryers at home. This compares to Europeans, where the numbers range between one-fifth and one-third. The high tax revenue needed to finance their welfare-spending could be causing problems. I was blown away by the fact that Europe’s welfare states account for half of the planet’s welfare spending. Looking at tax revenue as a share of economic output shows problems. It is currently around 38% in Germany, 43% in Italy, and 44% in France. The US is only at 25%. Their politics subsidize vacations, back to school equipment for children and public transit is free for everyone. A big problem is their workforce is at risk of declining due to an aging population. The average European is nearly 45 years old, compared with 39 for the average American, and the continent’s working-age population is predicted to fall by nearly 50 million by 2050. The question is who will pay all the tax revenue if there are less people working and more people collecting? We have our problems here at home in the US, but I worry Europe is on a troubling economic path. I was just in Europe, a couple weeks ago and what I saw of Spain and Portugal, I was not that impressed. It seemed every single piece of blank space new and old was covered with graffiti and I also noticed at the airport in Munich it was really dark as they appeared to only use half the lights to save energy. One may like to visit places in Europe for the history, but I believe over the next 10 years they’re going to have a meeting with reality that you cannot keep giving your citizens free stuff as less and less people work.