SMART INVESTING NEWSLETTER
Gold Investment, University Endowments, Trade Wars & Home Prices, Converting Pretax, Apple Margins & Stock Drops, Global Recession Fears, US Trade Deal Growth, 2025 US Tourism, Bitcoin & Mag 7
Brent Wilsey • April 25, 2025
Should you invest in gold for the long term?
Gold has been a great asset to hold over the last year, but I remain a skeptic of investing in gold long term. I personally don’t own any gold nor would I recommend buying gold at this point in time. While the recent gains in the price of gold look attractive, given the fact it is up over 20% so far this year in a difficult market, the long-term results aren’t enticing. There are periods of time where gold has been a strong performer, but trying to guess those periods is extremely difficult. If we look at January 1980 gold reached $850 per ounce, but the important number here is that the inflation adjusted price was $3,486 per ounce. This means it was not until recently when gold hit $3,500 per ounce, we see an all-time high on an inflation adjusted basis and essentially you made no real gain for over 45 years. At the end of the day gold is just a piece of metal worth only what the next person will pay for it. It has no earnings, no interest, no rents. This makes it extremely difficult to value and given the added expenses for trading and holding gold, it just does not make sense to me. I will continue to invest in good strong businesses at fair prices as I believe that is the best strategy for long term wealth creation.
Why is the government supporting universities with large endowments?
I’ve never really thought about this before. I have known that some big universities have multibillion dollar endowment funds, but I did not realize that 658 institutions have approximately $874 billion, which is nearly $1trillion in endowment funds. When I dug a little bit deeper, I discovered that in addition to these universities receiving money from the federal government via grants, some pay little or no income tax and also get a waiver on property taxes. If you’re starting to get a little bit irritated at this point because your hard-working dollars are going to universities like Harvard that has a $53 billion endowment or Yale with a $41 billion endowment, you might be like me and think it’s time that things change. The cost of tuition at Harvard is $57,000 per year and the President makes about $1.3 million a year. The president of San Diego State University has a salary of $531,000 and the cost for one year of tuition is about $8700. I’m sure the students at Harvard do receive a more prestigious education than at San Diego State University, but is it 6 1/2 times better? Do the students that graduate from Harvard make a salary that’s 600% more than a graduate from San Diego State University? I don’t think so. I wondered where money from these endowments goes and basically 48.1% of endowment distributions go to fund student financial aid, 17.7% goes to academic programs and research, 10.8% is used for endowment faculty positions and nearly 17% of the endowment funds are used for other purposes. Wouldn’t it be nice to know what those purposes are? I think we need to take a hard look at what universities have in their endowment funds, their tax benefits and grants, and let’s have more students here in the United States benefit from those billions of dollars to get a good education as opposed to the fat cats in the Ivy League towers of the universities. One other point I found interesting was the investing philosophy for these endowment funds. The goal is to earn around 8% per year and pay out 4.5% to 5% to fund those various expenses. This should then allow the endowment fund to continue growing. A big problem is many have not been able to achieve that goal with only 25% of 152 schools that were surveyed being able to meet the 8% return over the last 10 years. The other concern is if they can’t cut expenses if there is a lack of grants, many endowments are not liquid. Harvard for example had 39% in private equity, 32% in hedge funds, 5% in real estate, 3% in real assets, and just 3% in cash. With all this said I really believe this system should be reviewed to better the entire country, rather than just the Ivy League system.
Could the trade wars hurt home prices?
We are starting to see some cracks in the housing market, such as the delinquency rate on FHA mortgages, which cater to the high-risk borrowers who can’t qualify for a conventional mortgage because they either have a small down payment or weak credit. The delinquency rate for FHA currently stands at 11% according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, it has not been at this level for 12 years. Unfortunately, and we warned against it, but many people have stretched themselves too far financially to get into a home over the last few years. Because it’s only been two or three years since they bought their home, after fees and commissions they may not have much if any equity built up in that home. Another area of weakness that is being seen is with the homebuilders who have really increased their incentives because they have more completed but unsold homes. The builders are getting a little bit worried because they have not seen this many homes sitting on their lots with no buyers since 2009. The average incentives for homebuilders is usually around 5% of the total value of the home, but we are starting to see some incentives around 13% from big builders like Lennar. The volatility of the 10-year treasury, which mortgages generally trade off of, has not been helpful because it has had a wide trading range lately. This then makes it difficult for homebuyers to lock in a good rate. At this point in time, I think I would be waiting to buy a home until maybe late summer. I think there should be some good deals at that point in time as the tariff war should continue to progress and we should have a clearer picture of the economy by that time.
Financial Planning: Why converting 100% of pretax is bad
Roth conversions can be a powerful tax planning tool, but like any tool, using it the wrong way can do more harm than good. One of the most common mistakes we see is the idea that you should convert all of your pre-tax retirement savings, like a traditional IRA or 401(k), to a Roth account. Everyone loves the idea of a tax-free retirement. When you convert money from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, you're moving it from a pre-tax account to a tax-free account, but there’s a price, the converted amount is considered income and you must pay ordinary income tax in the year of the conversion. Once converted funds grow tax-free. The best way to think about money in a pre-tax account is that it is deferred income. It will be taxed, it’s just a matter of when. When you make contributions to a pre-tax account, you are not receiving a tax deduction, you are deferring income to a future year. When performing a Roth conversion, you are voluntarily deciding to pay tax on that income, even though you don’t have to yet. This only makes sense if you are able to convert at a lower tax rate than you would otherwise be subject to if you did not convert. This most commonly happens between the beginning of retirement, typically in your 60’s, and the beginning of your required distributions at age 75. During that period taxable income is generally lower which means conversions may be done at a lower tax rate than when required distributions begin at 75. Required distributions can be a problem because if you have too much in pre-tax accounts, your required taxable distributions may push you into a higher tax bracket and trigger IRMAA. Roth conversions help this by shifting funds from pre-tax to tax-free, therefore reducing the level of taxable distributions beginning at 75. However there is an efficient amount that should be converted for every person. Converting 100% of pre-tax funds means you will likely be in a lower tax bracket after the conversions, and will potentially not have any tax liability at all. This doesn’t sound bad, but it means you likely paid too much in tax to convert the funds in the first place. Again, money in a pre-tax account is deferred income that will be taxed. The goal is to have that income taxed at the lowest rate possible. If you convert too aggressively you may be settling for a higher tax rate on the money coming out and not receive enough tax-free income from the Roth to justify it. Instead, structuring withdrawals and conversions to keep your taxable income consistently low all through retirement will result in a higher level of after-tax income.
History shows Apple stock performs poorly when margins decline.
We all know that Apple is a great company and that the stock has done very well over the past few years; however, history has shown that when the margins get cut, the stock drops and so does the P/E ratio. In 2015 the stock dropped 16% that year as gross margins took a hit and Apple’s forward PE fell more than 30%, which makes sense because why would investors pay up for declining profitability. It was worse in 2013 when the stock dropped by 29% as the annual gross margin fell more than six points due to higher expenses with the new design of that years iPhone. No matter what Apple does this year, even with the talk of trying to move production to India, it is estimated that the cost to build iPhones will increase by 50%. So far, for some reason Wall Street has not put that declining gross margin into their calculations yet. Maybe they’ve been too busy selling alternative investments and have taken their eye off the price of Apple stock. In our opinion, at Wilsey Asset Management this could be far worse than 2013 or 2015 as far as a margin decline and a stock decline is concerned!
The world is fearful of a recession!
Many countries around the world are preparing for a slowdown in their economy and why is that? It’s because the biggest consumer in the world, the United States, is saying it wants equal and fair trade. The administration is essentially saying if you make our exports more expensive to your consumers, we’ll make your exports to us more expensive for our consumers. Central banks in countries like India, New Zealand and the Philippines have already cut their rates and I believe more countries will do the same going forward. South Korea announced a multibillion-dollar package of emergency support measures to help support the auto sector, which will likely see a big drop off in car sales as US consumers will not want to pay 25% more for their cars. The peoples bank of China, which controls the Chinese currency, has continued to let their currency decline against the U.S. dollar, which makes their products less expensive for US consumers and our products more expensive for Chinese consumers. The Bank of England recently delayed selling UK government bonds as they wanted to wait for a better time because of the volatility in the world bond market. With more than 70 countries around the world wanting to talk with the US about making a deal before they see more tariffs in July, countries like Vietnam are talking about buying more liquid natural gas and agricultural products from the US. Other countries seem to be preparing for a slowdown as well with Canada making it easier for their workers to apply for unemployment insurance and Spain recently rolled out a $16 billion aid package. I continue to remain confident trade deals will start to come through considering the fact that the US is the world’s largest consumer and many other countries don’t want these tariffs to persist as it would be devastating for their economies.
Trade deals with the US are starting to blossom
It’s only been a couple of weeks since the major tariff announcement but some countries are working with the US to come up with trade that is more balanced. We do believe this process will take months, but it is nice to see some progress. Vietnam said it will buy nearly $300 million in new Boeing jets. Thailand said it will purchase corn feed and Europe said they would boost soybean purchases. South Korea is talking about participating in a $44 billion liquefied natural gas project in Alaska. The EU, which currently gets about 45% of its LNG from the US talked about boosting the amount they import. They currently get 20% of their LNG from Russia. Wouldn’t it be nice if we took all that business from Russia and we exported to the EU 65% of their LNG. India said its target is to increase their current trade with the US fourfold to $500 billion. The Prime Minister of Israel has promised to get rid of the countries $7.4 billion trade surplus for goods with the US. It is more difficult for some lower income countries to purchase US goods and they have either promised to not fight back or pledged to remove their own tariffs on US imports. There is still a lot more work to be done and remember some of these trade deals are very complex and could be up to 50 pages long. While there hasn’t been the announcement of a major deal, it is nice to see some progress and we believe we will see things continue to develop over the next few months.
Will US tourism drop in 2025?
Recently Goldman Sachs estimated a possible decline in US tourism would hit GDP by 0.3%. It is not a huge amount of a decline in the GDP at about $90 billion, but it would be nice to see that increase not decrease. What I believe the Goldman Sachs estimate is missing is that the ICE US dollar index has declined close to 10% so far in 2025. One would have to go back 40 years to find such a decline this early in the year. This could actually be a positive for tourism because it makes foreigners currency much stronger, allowing them to buy more here in the United States. This would make travel to the United States more reasonable. This would also be a positive in the cost of our exports and could make them more attractive to other countries. While it may sound like a negative, the decline in the dollar does come with some benefits. The important part is the decline can’t turn into a freefall as that would be problematic considering our reserve currency status. I don’t believe you will see this happen though since the United States is still one of, if not the strongest economies in the world. I personally will continue to invest in the United States as we go through these difficult few months of uncertainty. I believe we will see much better times going forward that could come by early to late summer.
Bitcoin is back above $90,000
I always hate writing about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, but I do stay up to date on it and it still makes no sense to me. I would still rather have a US dollar backed by the taxing authority of the United States government than Bitcoin that is backed by speculation of hopefully a higher price in the future. For a currency I would like to have a relative stable value not the 3 to 4% daily moves up or down that can occur with Bitcoin. With that said, Bitcoin has risen over the last few days apparently because crypto is pushing deeper into the banking system. There are crypto firms such as Circle and BitGo that are looking at applying for a US bank charter. They’re looking at a national trust or an industrial bank charter so they could take deposits and make loans. I think this could be a situation to buy the rumor and sell the news because when a crypto firm obtains a bank charter, they would then be subject to far stricter rules and regulations. This could expose many concerns in the future. It was only just a few years ago when we saw the downfall of Silvergate Capital and Signature Bank. If you remember, that was a rather scary time and the federal government had to step in and cover bank deposits well above the insured limit of $250,000. It is hard to tell what direction cryptocurrency or Bitcoin is going, but I still put it in the highly speculative category where investors can make a lot of money, but also lose their shirt as well. We still recommend that investors stay away from cryptocurrency unless you view it as a gamble, but I still think Vegas is more fun if you are looking at gambling.
Is the curtain closing on the Magnificent Seven?
In case you’re not sure of what these seven stocks are, the list is: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla. As a group year to date, they are down around 20%, nearly double the S&P 500’s decline. Like all great things, eventually the curtain comes down and the show comes to a close. I am not predicting the end of the seven companies, but rather the excessively high valuations on their stocks that should come down to more reasonable levels. Only at that time would I recommend to buy these companies. Each one of these companies have their own headwinds and some of them are facing multiple headwinds. Just to give you some idea, starting off with Alphabet, also known as Google, for a second time in eight months a US judge has labeled Google an illegal monopolist. Keep in mind that they also pay $20 billion a year to Apple to be on the Safari browser default engine. From all that I have read on this case, I do have to side with the judge here. Amazon has been somewhat flying under the radar, but within the next few months, you will hear more about Amazon maintaining a monopoly as they are accused of using strategies to maintain its dominance. This includes price inflation, overcharging sellers, and stifling competition. The Federal Trade Commission does have a lawsuit against them, which will start ramping up within the next few months as a trial is scheduled for October 2026. Apple, in addition to headwinds with China and tariffs, has a lawsuit from the United States Department of Justice alleging that it monopolized the smartphone market and used its dominance to stifle competition. Meta Platforms is fighting with the Federal Trade Commission in court currently after being accused of purchasing Instagram and WhatsApp to fend off competition in the social media arena. This case from the FTC looks a little bit weaker to me. I would say there is probably a 50-50 chance it goes away, but if Meta were to lose, it could cost them 50% of their advertising revenue from Instagram. Microsoft appears to be in the clear from any government lawsuits for now, but their forward price/earnings ratio is still around 24 to 25 times and the amount of capital expenditures they have spent on artificial intelligence will likely cut into their forward earnings. There are also concerns with the lack of innovation in AI and the potential growth prospects. Nvidia was the do-nothing wrong company of 2024, but now people who thought the growth on their earnings could grow 50% for years to come have been rather shocked by the 34% decline in the stock from a high $153 to around $100 a share. We have talked about this in the past, but it appears that many companies that have over ordered chips for artificial intelligence have now backed off on buying more going forward. Lastly, Tesla has seen its stock drop from a high of $488 to around $240 per share, which is over a 50% decline will be hit hard by not only the tariffs, but also declining sales in China. Some US consumers are not happy with what Elon Musk is doing for the government and they could also weigh on US sales. This large drop in the Magnificent Seven reminds me of 25 years ago during the tech boom and bust. If history repeats itself, do not expect to have a 20-30% gain at year end if you are buying these stocks at these levels. I do believe you’ll be disappointed, not only over the next 6 to 7 months, but perhaps for the next few years to come.
Alternative Assets Appear to Be a House of Cards I remember using that same terminology back before the tech bust about 25 years ago. I was maybe a little bit early back then, but the house of cards collapsed. The more I read about alternative assets the more I scratch my head and ask how is Wall Street getting away with this? In the end, I believe the small investor will end up paying dearly for investing in these alternative assets. I learned something new over the weekend, a company called Hamilton Lane Private assets can buy private stakes from other holders at a discounted price, but then they can magically increase the value to the net asset value. This also reminds me of the mortgage crisis in 2008 with collateralized mortgage obligations better known as CMO‘s that also had major difficulties. Hamilton Lane Private assets can disregard the discounted price they paid no matter how they paid for it, even if it was in a competitive auction and again mark it up to net asset value. In 2024 there were $162 billion in secondary deals with an average discount of 11%. My question is how can they magically create $18 billion of value on those secondary deals. The incentive fees that private equity firms like Hamilton Lane earn range from 10 to 12 1/2%. If it sounds complicated, it is and if you don’t understand something, you should not be investing in it no matter how simple your broker tries to make it sound. The greed on Wall Street appears to be running rampant, I would highly caution investors to avoid any type of private equity in their portfolio. Tariffs Are Still Not Impacting Inflation The May Consumer Price Index, also known as CPI, showed little impact from tariffs. Headline CPI came in at 2.4%, which was right in line with expectations and core CPI, which excludes food and energy, came in at 2.8%, which was actually below the expectation of 2.9%. The headline CPI continues to remain softer than core CPI due to falling energy prices. Compared to last year, energy prices were down 3.5% and gasoline in particular fell 12.0%. The core prices do remain a little bit stuck at the 2.8% level considering it was at that level in both the March and April reports as well, but considering the concern around tariffs I would say this was a really strong report. It will be interesting to see the coming months as economists are pointing to the fact that companies brought in excess inventory before the tariffs were implemented so they are still working through pre tariff inventory and have not needed to raise prices yet. I do wonder if inflation does not substantially increase at what point will economists say that the tariffs maybe aren’t as impactful as they once thought? My belief remains that we will see a small uptick in inflation in the coming months, but there are other forces reducing inflation in some areas so I think it will be more muted than many believe. Health and Human Services Is Receiving a Major Makeover Back in the 60s, the world looked to America’s health regulators for guidance because they had a reputation for integrity, scientific impartiality and a strong defense of patient welfare. Today and for probably the last couple of decades, HHS has lost trust among many people. This week, a major shakeup of the advisory committee for immunization practices known as ACIP is retiring all 17 of the current members on the committee. In the past, the committee had many persistent conflicts of interest and approved every vaccine that came through. The committee met behind closed doors and without transparency the public had no faith in their decisions. Some of the members had financial stakes or received substantial funding from the pharmaceutical companies. I’m happy to report with all 17 of the committee members being forced into retirement we should see big changes on the approval of vaccines and hopefully in a few years, the HHS and the committee can regain public trust. This could have an impact on some pharmaceutical stocks if vaccines go through a more rigorous approval process. Financial Planning: What If There’s a Recession While in Retirement? With 8 in 10 Americans already changing their spending habits and 58% expecting a recession, it’s clear that economic uncertainty is weighing heavily on people’s minds. But the reality is if you're retiring soon, or already retired, you should assume you'll face multiple recessions, market corrections, and bear markets during your retirement. It’s not a matter of it, but when. Historically, recessions occur about every 6 to 10 years and typically last 10 to 18 months. Market corrections, defined as a drop of 10% or more, happen about once every 1 to 2 years, and bear markets, declines of 20% or more, occur roughly every 5 to 6 years, lasting on average about 10 months, though the recovery to previous highs can take up to 2 years or more depending on the severity. The point isn’t to try and time retirement around these events, it’s to build an income strategy that expects them. A well-structured retirement income plan includes diversified investment portfolio that will provide long-term growth, cash reserves to avoid selling investments at a loss, a sustainable withdraw rate, and flexibility to adjust withdrawals from various sources when needed. By accepting volatility as a normal part of retirement, you can build a plan that weathers it and sleep better when the markets are volatile. Yes, the Rich Are Getting Richer That is how the saying goes and the rich did get richer in 2024. With the nice gains for many assets during the year, the number of people in North America with at least $1 million in investible assets grew to 8.4 million, which was an increase of 7.3%. This led to the group’s wealth increasing by 8.9%, to nearly $30 trillion. It is important to understand that the ultrarich, which is those with at least $30 million in assets, really provides a lot of the wealth. While this group represents just one percent of wealthy individuals, it accounts for 34% of all the wealth. People that have investable assets of less than $1 million should not despair and they too should continue to invest and grow their wealth. One of the reasons that the rich get richer is that they spend more time understanding investing they tend to buy assets. In many cases they are also more conservative as they don’t want to lose what they have. In my experience, many times people with less than $1 million in assets like to gamble in higher risk investments trying to get rich quick and we all know how that turns out. If you only have $100,000 or even $50,000 one should adhere to a good investment plan of buying good quality equities, and not panic and sell when a drop in price occurs. Any easy way people with lower incomes and investable assets can grow their wealth is in 401K plans and IRAs. This can increase the percent of their investments by a larger magnitude compared to a person with over $1 million because the contribution limits are not as effective on higher dollar amounts. For example, if you max out your 401k this year, which would be $23,500, that would have a much larger impact on the percent your assets grew if you had $100,000 instead of $1 million. I believe If one plans well and invests in good quality equities along with staying the course, it is very possible that they too can pass the $1 million in investible assets. The Disappointing Cybertruck From Tesla I’m not surprised that the Cybertruck is not selling as well as expected. It is selling well under the estimates and when I say well under, I mean it because in 2024 Elon Musk estimated goal was 250,000 sales per year. It did not even come close to that figure last year as sales came in under 40,000. The first quarter of 2025 looks even worse with total sales of only 7,100. Could it be because it is still the ugliest vehicle on the road? It reminds me of years ago when VW had the Thing. Could it be the price of around $100,000 is too high? Interestingly, the price has already been greatly reduced as the company has likely been trying to get sales moving. Or could it be the seven recalls on the Cybertruck? I do know that some of these were software issues, which could be fixed by a download, but there are also issues with the windshield cracking. The windshield is very heavy and very long. Also, what is known as a cant rail could fall off while you’re driving down the road because the adhesive was too weak. Another scary recall was the accelerator pedal that had a rectangular pad can become loose and get stuck under the paneling, which locks the accelerator in the down position, that’s a scary thought! It took years for the truck to come to market and it definitely did not meet those initial claims. It was first announced in 2019 at a cost of $39,900 with a battery range of 500 miles and it was supposed to be able to go in the water. Fast forward to the reality of today and the price as I said is well above $40,000. The battery range at best is 350 miles and the truck needs to stay on land and it cannot function on water. I have seen a few around town and I think the people driving them are pretty proud that their vehicle stands out, but I still think it is one of the ugliest things on the road and you could not give me one. Shocker… California Continues to Struggle With Gas Prices We have discussed how refiners are closing in California due to growing regulatory and cost pressures. Both Phillips 66 and Valero will close two major refineries in the state by next year, but there are already problems with supply and recent outages at refineries in the state have only added fuel to the fire. The state’s fuel imports climbed to 279k barrels per day in May, which was the highest in four years. This meant refiners had to turn to trading partners in Asia to make up for the shortage of fuel. The shrinking supply will likely only exacerbate this problem and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the import numbers continue to climb. The restrictive policies and the high taxes in California have led to gas prices that are far above the national average. Last Friday, retail gas prices averaged $4.68 per gallon in California versus a national average of $3.12 per gallon. This means California prices are about 50% higher than the national average. The Tidal Wave in Bitcoin Continues to Build Bitcoin is trading over $100,000 once again and it has attracted a lot of attention. Public companies are even starting to buy Bitcoin to put it in their treasury to hopefully get a boost in their stock price. It appears about 60 public companies with ties to the stock market are using a Bitcoin strategy for their treasury investments. They are in hopes that Bitcoin will continue to increase in value and ultimately boost their stock price. Some of these public companies are even borrowing or selling shares of their stock to raise money to purchase Bitcoin. I remember back during the tech boom many companies were implementing a similar strategy as they were buying high risk tech stocks in an effort to boost the value of their own stock price. We know how that ended. Based on research, if Bitcoin would fall below $90,000, roughly half of the public companies that invested in Bitcoin would then have a loss on their investment. If the company stock price began to fall, the companies may elect to unwind their investments in Bitcoin, which then could create an avalanche of selling. Who knows where the bottom would be? The only reason Bitcoin is being bought now is because it continues to go up, but we know that cannot go on forever. Bitcoin does not pay dividends, interest or anything else, it is just a gambling chip. As I mentioned in the title, this is a title wave where the wave continues to grow and get bigger and bigger until at some point in time it collapses and wipes out everyone involved. I don’t know where we are with the Bitcoin tidal wave, but I would not want to be holding any of it finally crashes on the shores. A Hot Summer Is Going to Lead to Higher Utility Bills The temperatures for June, July, and August are expected to be higher this year than last year and that’s not the only thing that could be going higher. It is projected with lower supply and higher demand that natural gas prices could also be higher. Natural gas futures are currently around $3.80 per million British thermal units and are expected to rise with estimates of above four dollars and some estimates even hitting five dollars by August. For the past two years there has been a glut of natural gas and prices have stayed on the low side. But now with demand for LNG, which is liquefied natural gas, and power producers requiring more energy, natural gas prices will likely push higher. The biggest natural gas demand is still in the winter months, but because of the warmer summer, the demand is picking up with power plants accounting for 41% of US natural gas consumption. There’s also a lack of natural gas piping on the East Coast, which really slows down the transportation and is adding to its cost. Other countries around the world need natural gas as well, and the United States has now become a big producer and exporter of LNG, which takes away from our supply here at home. The natural gas market in the US has now becomes a global market. We need to correct the pipeline matrix and develop more natural gas to meet the increasing demand and keep prices low. The Sun Is Setting on Solar Companies The tide has definitely turned-on installers of residential solar companies, which have been hurt by higher interest rates and now the tax and spending package passed by the House of Representatives includes eliminating certain tax credits for rooftop solar and battery storage. This has crushed companies like Sunnova Energy International, which at one point had a market capitalization of $5 billion and over 400,000 customers. The company was started in Texas in 2012 to provide affordable residential solar products across the country. The stock is now a penny stock after falling 93% and has a market cap under $30 million. The company cannot pay its debt or attract new investors and will likely file bankruptcy. They are not alone as SunPower, Lumio, and Solar Mosaic filed for bankruptcy last year. Titan solar also just closed the doors, leaving their residential customers nowhere to turn. Sunnova being the biggest was probably hurt the most last year. The company lost $448 million and probably has very little chance of ever being a profitable business again without the tax credits as many consumers will forgo solar energy. Because of the high cost of energy in California, there may be some room for a small operator to offset the high cost of electricity in the state. Another well-known company in the solar industry is First Solar, which has seen its stock drop nearly 50% in the past year may have a chance to survive since they sell and manufacture solar for businesses rather than residential customers. The fundamentals of the company look pretty good and it appears since they manufacture solar in the US they will continue to receive some tax credits, but the future for this company is just too fuzzy and while they may pull through, I don’t think the risk is worth the reward.
Jobs market remains in a good spot Headline nonfarm payrolls increased 139k in the month of May, which was above the estimate of 125k, but below April’s reading of 147k. A big negative in the report was the fact that March and April saw negative revisions that caused payrolls in those month to decline by a combined 95k versus what was previously reported. Even with that, if you zoom out and look at the big picture the economy is still adding jobs at a healthy rate given the fact that the unemployment rate has remained at 4.2%. I would also say it was a big positive that the private sector saw good growth since federal government payrolls declined by 22k in the month of May and are now down by 59k since January. I still expect losses to accelerate in the coming months for government payrolls since employees on paid leave or receiving ongoing severance pay are still counted as employed. Areas that saw major growth in the month included health care, which added 62k jobs and leisure and hospitality, which added 48k jobs in the month. Many of the other major industries saw little change. Wages were also positive in the month for workers as average hourly earnings grew 3.9% compared to last year. This was above the forecast of 3.7% and last month’s reading of 3.8%. I believe this is a good level for wage growth as it is healthy for workers, but not overly concerning on the inflation front. I would say this jobs report did little to change the narrative on the economy as it showed it remains healthy, but it definitely appears to be slowing. Office space may be harder to find in the coming years For the first time in at least 25 years, office conversions and demolitions will exceed new construction, which means there will be less space available. CBRE Group found that across the largest 58 U.S. markets, 23.3 million square feet of space will be demolished or converted to other uses by the end of this year while just 12.7 million square feet of space is expected to be completed by developers in those markets. We do have an office REIT in our portfolio and they recently talked about how leasing has continued to exceed expectations. I continue to believe the office has a valuable place in business and we have continued to see more and more companies implement return to office mandates. With less supply out there and demand remaining strong, we should see owners of office space benefit from stabilizing rents and increasing prices in the coming years. On the other side of coin, I have continued to express concern about the long term dynamics for multifamily housing due to the construction boom in the space and potential oversupply. It’s not just the new construction though as developers have another 85 million square feet of office space being readied for conversion in the next few years. This comes after office conversations to multifamily residences that have generated roughly 33,000 apartments and condominiums since 2016. It is estimated by CBRE that each conversion on average produces around 170 units. As a contrarian investor I many times like to go against the grain. With that being said I am definitely much more interested in the office space over the residential space at this point in time. Facebook scams are out of control There’s no way of tracking the exact number of scams or the dollar amount lost from scams on Facebook and Instagram, but JP Morgan Chase said between the summers of 2023 and 2024 they accounted for nearly half of all reported scams on Zelle. An internal analysis from 2022 found that 70% of newly active advertisers on the platform are some forms of scam or low-quality products. Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, does over $160 billion in advertising and is hesitant to put any restrictions that could prevent growth in their ad business. In 2024, the Wall Street Journal discovered documents that advertisers can be hit with anywhere between eight and 32 automated strikes for financial fraud before their accounts are banned. On top of that, Facebook Marketplace, which is its online secondhand market, has now passed Craigslist as the most heavily used platform for free classified ads and it has become a great place for scams. The scam that most people fall for is the sale of pets. This comes even though Meta bans the peer-to-peer sale of live animals. Meta has as argued in court it is not their legal responsibility to deal with the issue. Section 230 in the US telecommunications law relieves platforms like Facebook and Instagram from liability of users who create their own content. This is currently being tested by an Australian mining billionaire because Facebook failed to remove fraudulent investment advertisements that used his image and AI cloned voice. Hopefully he wins the case. In the meantime, I would have to recommend that people stay away from using Facebook or Instagram for buying from advertisers on their platforms because you could be dealing with someone from China, Vietnam, or the Philippines, who have stolen pictures of a familiar company that you think you know, even including its address. And once you give them your credit card information or any other financial information, they have you and your problems will begin. Financial Planning: Retirement Savings Rate Hits Record High; How Do You Compare? The average 401(k) savings rate, including employee contributions and employer matches, has reached a record high of 14.3%, nearing the widely recommended target of 15% for a secure retirement. This milestone reflects growing awareness of the importance of long-term financial planning, especially as traditional pensions continue to disappear. However, the ideal savings rate isn’t one-size-fits-all. Individuals who begin saving in their early 20s may be able to retire comfortably with a lower contribution rate, while those who delay investing until their 30s or 40s often need to save well above 15% to catch up. Starting early allows compound interest to do more of the heavy lifting, highlighting the value of consistent, proactive saving from a young age. For example, someone who starts at the beginning of their career might be okay saving as little as 7% of their income and still retire on time. This means if they save the minimum necessary to receive the full company match (5% contribution + 4% match = 9%) they likely will be fine. However, waiting until their 40’s may require a savings rate of 25% or more to produce the same retirement income. Sell gold and buy platinum I thought you might be thinking you’ve done so well buying gold and you may think it’s still going higher so just stay the course, but platinum has been left behind for the last 11 years. Back in 2014, platinum was at $1500 an ounce compared with gold at $1300 per ounce. Fast forward to today and gold is around $3300 per ounce and platinum has gone down in value to about $1000. Platinum actually has real demand as about 40% of the demand comes from catalytic converters which are a hot commodity, we just recently wrote about how April car sales were up 10%. Platinum supply is about 7 million ounces on an annual basis, but it is predicted by the world platinum investment council that in 2025 it may only be 5.4 million ounces. Compare that with gold which will have about 100 million ounces mined this year. Perhaps platinum could be the next shiny metal that performs well. There is even talk that Chinese buyers who are priced out of gold are now starting to invest in platinum. If you like precious metals, you may want to do some research on platinum. It could be on sale for now. To be clear I don’t buy these precious metals, but given the choice between gold and platinum, platinum definitely seems more interesting at these levels. Job openings report shows there is still plenty of work out there The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, also known as the JOLTs report, showed job openings remained strong as they increased 191,000 from the month of March and totaled 7.4 million. This also beat the expectation of 7.1 million and provides further evidence that the labor market remains healthy. Job openings did decline by 228,000 or about 3% compared to last year, but there are still 1.03 available jobs for every unemployed worker. As we have discussed, we are looking for the labor market and economy to continue to soften, but that does not mean it is weak, it just means we could be progressing at a slower rate. As with other hard economic data, the next few months will be more telling about how the tariffs are impacting business decisions. This JOLTs report was from the month of April, when tariffs were just beginning. I still believe the data will hold up alright in the coming months even in the face of these trade negotiations that are occurring across the world. Computers in our brain may not be that far away It’s a scary thought, but there are already people with brain computers and interfaces that have been installed. It is currently less than 100 people to date and it is estimated that will double within the next year. Businesses in this field are called neurotech companies. It is projected in the next 15 years or so this will be a $1 billion a year market. Some of the designs are an implant of a tubular mesh of electrons that will run through a major blood vessel in the brain like a stent. There are different designs by different companies and some have over 1000 electrodes spread across 1.5 centimeters. The benefits of having these installed in your brain will be figuring out which medication works best for that particular brain chemistry. Going beyond that are thoughts to control vehicles, limbs, and exoskeletons along with generating speech directly from thought. There are about 12 small companies now working on this and I believe most will go probably go broke before they make it big. I’m sure some will be acquired by big medical technology companies or device makers that will take it to the next level. Don’t let the future scare you as it’s going to come anyways, but I do wonder with all the positives of this technology what negatives will there be as well? Will cybercriminals be able to hack into your brain? Or on the bright side will your spouse really know what you’re thinking. I think that’s a good thing, right? The growth in gambling might become a problem Gambling has been around forever, but you always had to go to a casino or have your own bookie to take your bets. This mostly occurred in person. Now with companies like DraftKings and FanDuel it is far too easy for people to get addicted to gambling on their phone. In 2024 the revenue from gambling was $71.9 billion. Now with the ease of cell phones, 48% of American men under 50 have an online gambling account and wager about $150 billion a year on sports alone. It’s now been seven years since the Supreme Court ruled that nationwide sports betting is legal. It’s no surprise the problem of gambling addiction is starting to appear and the journal of behavioral addictions says smartphone apps carry higher addiction risk than traditional gambling at casinos and horse tracks. That’s no surprise to me because of the ease of holding in your hand this gambling tool. For someone that has a gambling problem, it takes about seven years for them to start to realize they have a problem. The numbers now show this explosive growth as companies like FanDuel saw its revenue jump from $2.8 billion in 2019 to nearly $17 billion today. DraftKings is also seeing huge growth as revenue was $432 million in 2019 and now it is at $6.3 billion. I had a feeling the stocks would do well but would not invest in them because of the nature of their business and also, they had no earnings at the time. For those that did gamble with the stocks, DraftKings shares are up 156% over the last three years because of the massive growth in this industry. Unfortunately, in the next few years, problems could start showing up in the healthcare industry. This belief is based on an 11-year study that ended in 2016 from the National Council on Problem Gambling that showed 20% of gamblers with this disorder attempted suicide. According to the Journal of Gambling Business and Economics just under 6% of those who gamble on US sports generate 80% of the betting revenue. As the growth of gamblers grows, more people will be betting and that 6% number will likely rise.
First Time Homebuyers Hit a Record Low With the high cost of housing and higher interest rates, people trying to get their first home dropped to a record low around 23% in 2024. The average age of the first-time homebuyer has increased 10 years over the historical average to 38 years old. The median income is now $97,000 and the first-time home buyers are coming up with an average down payment of 9% of the value of the home. Many of these young buyers are using FHA loans, which require a very small down payment and according to research roughly 30% of all FHA mortgages have a debt service ratio of over 50%. This means more than half of these buyers’ incomes is going toward servicing debt. This could be a hard pill to swallow for young buyers with not much money left over for luxuries like vacations and new cars. However, if when they buy the home, they understand that if they really tighten their belts for the next three to four years, they will probably be fine. New home builders are doing what they can to try and get rid of the largest inventory of unsold homes on their lots since 2009. The median price of a new home is currently less than one percent higher than the median price of existing properties, which historically has seen a 17% premium. The home builders are using profits from their homes to buy down mortgages. Even though the 30-year mortgage was recently around 6.8%, home builders can buy these mortgages down which led buyers of new homes to a rate around 5%. Buying down these rates has cost home builders about 8% of the purchase price of the home. This reduces their profits but better than the alternative of sitting on unsold homes with a carrying cost for the builder. I don’t see this situation getting better anytime soon because I’m not looking for a large decrease in mortgage rates and incomes over the next year will probably increase somewhere around 3 to 4%. We continue to believe the rapid increase in the price of homes over the last few years will not last and it will now take some time to get back to normal market. Maybe we will see a better real estate market in 2027 or 2028. Is Bitcoin coming to your 401k? I have been concerned with bitcoin and crypto as a whole for several years for many reasons including fraud, illicit activity, and the fact that there is really no way to derive an intrinsic value for it since there is no earnings, cash flow, or anything really backing the asset class. I was disappointed to see the current Labor Department removed language that cautioned employers to exercise “extreme care” before making crypto and related investments available to their workers. They cited “serious concerns” about the prudence of exposing investors’ retirement savings to crypto given “significant risks of fraud, theft, and loss.” While this isn’t necessarily a full-on endorsement for placing crypto in 401k plans, it definitely seems like the administration is continuing on its path to try and normalize crypto as an established asset class. Even with this change in language I would be surprised to see a huge surge in cryptocurrencies within 401k plans. Ultimately, ERISA bestows a fiduciary duty on employers and company officials overseeing 401k investments and that means legally employers must put the best interests of 401(k) investors first and act prudently when choosing which investments to offer (or not offer). Given the extreme volatility within crypto I believe it would be a huge risk for these companies to offer it as it could open them up to lawsuits if there are major declines. We’ll have to see what other changes are made as time progresses, but I don’t believe crypto has any place within a 401k plan at this time. Inflation report shows continued progress The personal consumption expenditures price index, which is also known as PCE and is the Federal Reserve’s key inflation measure, showed an annual increase of just 2.1%. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, showed a gain of 2.5%. Both results were 0.1% below their respective estimates. Overall, inflation has continued to cool and is now quite close to the Fed’s 2% target. The question that remains is how will tariffs ultimately impact inflation? An economist from Pantheon Macroeconomics said that he believed core PCE would peak later this year between 3.0% and 3.5%, if the current mix of tariffs remained in place. I would say it is difficult to forecast the tariff impact since we don’t know what will ultimately be passed on to the end consumer. It will definitely be interesting to see what numbers look like in the coming months, but ultimately, I believe most of the concerns around inflation are overblown and even if the rate for PCE is around 3%, I don’t see that as being problematic for the economy. Financial Planning: What it Means to be an Accredited Investor An accredited investor is someone who meets specific income or net worth thresholds—such as earning over $200,000 annually ($300,000 with a spouse) or having over $1 million in net worth excluding their home—and is allowed to invest in private securities offerings not registered with the SEC. These investments, which include private REITS, private equity, hedge funds, and startups, often promise high returns but carry significant risks such as illiquidity, limited transparency, and the potential for total loss. While many of these offerings are only available through fiduciary advisors—who are legally obligated to act in their clients’ best interest—investors must still exercise caution. Fiduciary duty applies only in certain contexts (such as investment advice) and may not extend to related areas like insurance or commission-based products. Additionally, what qualifies as “acting in your best interest” is often subjective and open to interpretation. Working with a fiduciary does not guarantee protection, and investors should remain vigilant, ask questions, and independently evaluate any recommendation. Also, private investments aren’t necessary better than public investments, so just because you qualify as an accredited investor doesn’t mean you should be investing in private securities. Is a buyer’s market coming to the housing market? Interest rates on mortgages have stayed pretty much above 6% since September 2022 and it doesn’t look like they’ll be falling anywhere close to 6% anytime soon. But for those looking to buy a new home, we could be looking at a homebuyer’s market soon. It’s not here yet, but there are signs that the number of homes listed for sale this spring has increased, while sales have actually decreased. Nationally, existing home sales are down 2.4% through April while the number of properties for sale has increased by 5.1%. Unfortunately for buyers, prices for homes are still high and mortgage rates have increased which has led to affordability still being a major problem. On a national level about 20% of home sellers cut prices on their homes in April, which was the largest amount of price cuts since April 2017. Zillow expects a national drop on average of 1.4%, but areas where there is higher priced homes and rising listings, the drops could be larger. Areas where there are second home owners could also see declines as many of them are sitting on a lot of equity in that house and they may not be using it as much as they thought they would. This could lead them to take advantage of that equity and sell at a reasonable price. Unfortunately, for the entry-level homebuyer competition is still fairly high and supply remains quite low, but that could change in the future as well. If you’re a buyer waiting to buy a home, I would be patient and keep your down payment in a high-yield money market, which should pay you around 4% while you wait to get that home that you want. Patience pays off in investing and home buying. The U.S. is far ahead of Europe in Business People love to travel to Europe to see history and maybe drink the French or the Italian wine, but when it comes to growing the economy Europe is far behind the US. Going back 50 years the US has created 241 new companies worth more than $10 billion, Europe pales in comparison creating only 14 new companies of that size over the last 50 years. Europe continues to fall behind the U.S. in productivity, 35 years ago the average EU worker produced 95% of what Americans did. Fast-forward to 2025 and Europeans now produce less than 80% of an American worker. It’s surprising that even though Europe has 449 million people, which is over 100 million more than the US, their economy is now 1/3 smaller than the US economy. Investors and entrepreneurs in Europe say the obstacles that prevent growth are a timid and risk adverse business culture, strict labor laws, regulations that stifle any type of growth and a smaller pool of venture capital. It is estimated that European businesses spend 40% of their IT budgets on complying with regulations. Also, many of these companies are confused as 2/3 of European businesses don’t understand their obligation under the EU AI act. I suggest to take this as an important history lesson for younger people who may think that more government is good. More government does not produce a growing economy and if you and your children want a higher standard living going forward, it takes hard work and competition, not government regulation and control. Crypto Exchange Kraken is going to offer digital tokens backed by stocks I can’t believe that this is happening, but it is and crypto exchange company Kraken said it would occur within the next few weeks. The company will be rolling out digital tokens that are supposed to be back by stocks such as Apple, Tesla, Nvidia and other popular companies. This also includes ETFs, like the SPDR S&P500 and the SPDR gold fund. These will not be available to US investors, but it is instead for other countries around the world to invest in US stocks. This is supposed to be easier than the current way of investing in US stocks through local brokerages. These digital tokens will be referred to as Xstocks And will be on the Solana Block chain platform. It is expected that Kraken’s partner, Backed Finance, will acquire new shares of stock as these tokens are sold to back up the value of the digital tokens. Trading of these digital tokens will be allowed 24 hours a day seven days a week. I’m concerned this could cause extreme volatility for some of these stocks as they may need to be purchased in large quantities each week day morning based on the activity that occurred while the market was closed. I think some crazy things could happen. I see huge concerns here and lots of room for fraud as it could be discovered the digital tokens are not backed by the correct number of shares. Maybe my thinking is old-fashioned but just seems to me if I’m going to invest in a company, I want to actually hold shares in that company not have someone acting as a middleman. I think unfortunately people trading these digital tokens don’t care about true investing and it’s just going to be more speculation. I do hope they fail like the crypto company Binance did when they tried the same thing back in 2021. The regulators around the world felt like Binance did not have the correct licenses to do this. But don’t worry, Kraken is regulated by the Wyoming division of banking and has a special purpose depository banking license. Well, that should make investors feel a whole lot better, right? The History of FICO Most people have heard of a FICO score, however I’m sure most have no idea how it was established and also that it is a public company that has performed very, very well over its history. The company was started back in 1956 by an engineer named Bill Fair and a mathematician named Earl Isaac. Each put in $400 of startup capital and it took two years to sell their first credit score. The name of the company is Fair Isaac company, which is where they came up with the FICO score. 31 years later on July 1987, it went public and sold 1.4 million shares at $9.50 per share. The stock now trades around $1650 for a total return of about 17,200%. There are very few investments that could come even close to that type of return. The company does not collect money directly from the customers who receive their credit score, it generally comes through application fees and is paid by the lenders. The company has what is known as inelastic demand, which unlike many other companies they can raise prices and the customers will still pay for their service. Sounds like a little bit of a monopoly to me. They are used by 90% of US lenders and do over 10 billion credit decisions a year. They do over $30 billion a year in sales with only 3700 employees. The free cash flow of the company increased by 30% to $607 million last year and it bought back $822 million of stock. The company sounds very attractive; however, it trades it around 40 times forward earnings, which is rather pricey and the slowdown in the real estate market could hurt the company going forward.
The US just received a downgrade to its credit rating, should you worry? Last week, Moody’s announced it downgraded the United States sovereign credit rating from AAA to Aa1. While a downgrade is important to understand and can have negative consequences for interest rates, this downgrade did not seem too problematic. I mainly say that because Moody’s was the last major credit rating agency to have the U.S. at the highest possible rating. The first downgrade carried the most weight in my opinion as it had the highest shock value. Standard & Poor’s was the first to move in August 2011 and the stock market fell 6.66% the session after the announcement. Fitch then lowered its rating on U.S. debt in August 2023 and the stock market lost 1.38%. After this Moody’s downgrade the stock market seemed to have little reaction as it actually had a small increase following the news. While this downgrade may sound scary, I don’t believe it will have long term consequences considering the fact that US debt is still viewed as a very safe asset. With that said, the US does need to address the growing deficit problem as further downgrades from these credit agencies could cause problems. Demand for electric vehicles is falling dramatically Electric vehicle sales in the month of April declined 5% while the overall car market grew by 10%. This is only the third monthly decline in four years for electric vehicles. The reason for the decline is consumers are watching their spending more than they have in a while and many of the deals and promotions for electric vehicles have disappeared. It was not just Tesla who had difficulty because of Elon Musk’s political association, but even Kia, Hyundai and Ford experienced drops. Rivian was hit hardest on their R1T pickup truck as it saw a 50% decline in sales for April. With some of the crazy electric vehicle lease deals gone, consumers are also asking the question about charging related concerns. There are some car buyers who were considering buying an electric vehicle but they said it’s not worth the stress of charging your vehicle all the time. It’s just much easier to pull into a gas station that is always easy to find. This is only one month of electric vehicle sales and not a trend that has been going on for a while, but with the increased production of oil from OPEC and a large potential supply of oil in the future, gas prices should decline which takes away the incentive of paying more for an electric vehicle. High risk, private market investments are showing up in more 401(k) plans Another big 401K provider called Empower who oversees $1.8 trillion in 401(k) assets for about 19 million people has decided it will start allowing private credit, equity and real estate in some of the accounts they administer later this year. I think this is a terrible idea for investors. I have seen the back end of these private deals and many times investors have made no money from them and can only get out a little bit of their money at a time, while they are suffering from low returns and high fees. No surprise Wall Street loves these private market investments because of high fees, which range anywhere from 1% to 2% of the portfolio balance on an annual basis. One way they are trying to sneak in the private market funds is with a 10% allocation in the popular target date funds. This is pretty sneaky because you may be thinking you’re getting a pretty conservative stock and bond fund that becomes more conservative as you get older, but with a 10% allocation in these private assets I believe it will increase the funds risk and lower the returns going forward. As always, the bankers on Wall Street only care about generating more fees, and don’t care if investors lose money as long as they bring in their billions of dollars in profits. If you see these in your 401(k) options, cross them off the list and stick to the traditional long-term investments that have worked for so many years now. Financial Planning: Who Benefits from the new SALT proposal? The current SALT deduction allows taxpayers who itemize to deduct up to $10,000 of certain state and local taxes, most importantly their state income taxes and property taxes, from their federal taxable income. The new proposal in the House bill would raise this cap to $40,000 for households earning under $500,000, with a phaseout that fully eliminates the expanded deduction at $600,000. Married and single tax filers alike with incomes over $600,000 would be subject to the $10,000 SALT limit. This change is intended to benefit middle- and upper-middle-income taxpayers in high-tax states, while limiting the benefit for higher earners. The proposal also includes annual 1% inflation adjustments beginning in 2026. If the bill is signed into law in its current form, the larger deduction would apply beginning in tax year 2025. If passed, tax payers who make less than $600k in high tax states who own a home with a mortgage will see the biggest tax benefit and they may want to adjust their tax withholdings or estimated tax payments to account for it. However, the bill has not passed the Senate, and the final terms are likely to change. US air traffic control systems need to be updated and repaired When it comes to flying, we always think about the safety of the airplane and the pilot flying the plane. I know I always feel pretty safe when I get on a new plane. I think that’s just human nature now and with the amount people travel, we think it’s less likely to fail. But sometimes it’s the things that are not in front of us or obvious that can harm us. There are 138 US air traffic control systems in the US and a recent study showed that 76% of these control systems are either obsolete or potentially too difficult to maintain. There is no need to panic or cancel that flight next month, but it is good that this was brought to light because we now know the US air traffic control system has not kept up with technology and needs to be updated. The Federal Aviation Administration known as the FAA is aware of this and is taking action to update the system. The recent incident at Newark Liberty airport brought this situation to light and there have been other less known incidents of communication problems within the traffic control system. They are still fighting a shortage of air traffic controllers, and with the obsolete technology the FAA needs to come up with a plan soon. Coinbase to pay out up to $400 million Coinbase Global, which will be going into the S&P 500, got hit with a $20 million ransom from cyber criminals who stole information on Coinbase accounts including details like names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses. It looks like they even got access to Social Security and bank account numbers along with government ID images from driver’s licenses and passports. If you follow us on a regular basis, you know we’re not advocates of cryptocurrencies, but this scam happened because they attained information by bribing multiple contractors and employees working in support roles outside the United States. The ransom was for $20 million, which Coinbase refused to pay and they are instead offering a $20 million reward to find the cyber criminals. According to a regulatory filing, it is estimated that it could cost Coinbase to reimburse their customers and fix the problem between $200-$400 million. 97,000 customers were affected by this hack and as I said while we do not back cryptocurrencies, I was pleased to see that they were not paying the ransom of $20 million because it just keeps these cyber criminals going. Who should be responsible for recycling, the company producing the product or the consumer? Beverage companies like Coca-Cola and Pepsi are being pushed to stop producing plastic bottles and containers and use an alternative source like glass bottles that can be returned. This would be an added cost that more than likely would be passed along to the consumer. Being a businessman, I’m going to push back a little bit and say it should not be the responsibility of the company, but the consumer should be the one that recycles the plastic products as the end user. I have been a big recycler for as long as I can remember as it just made sense to me and it didn’t seem that hard to do. I was disappointed to see in the 1960’s, the United States recycled 7% of recyclable products but by 2025 that only increased to 32%. I thought it would be much higher in the United States. I was also surprised that the state with the highest recycling is not California as Maine takes the crown recycling 74% of their products. Around the globe, Sweden wins hand down recycling 99% of their local made products. The country Chile is definitely way behind as it only recycles one percent. I do agree something needs to be done considering the fact that since the 1950s, 9.2 billion tons of plastic has been produced of which about 75% is in our landfills, dumps and the ocean and unfortunately, they’ll be there for quite a while. A plastic bottle takes anywhere from 450 years to as long as 1000 years to decompose. The global concern is that in 35 years plastic waste could triple. I know I’m going to ruffle some feathers, but again I blame the consumer for not recycling. I found it interesting if you do recycle, crushing the plastic bottles slows down the process because the advanced machines don’t recognize it as a bottle and may think it is another product rather than plastic. War weapons have changed dramatically over the years If you go back in time, we had weapons like wooden arrows, swords and cannons. We then saw the addition of bullets, missiles, and jets. Now weapons are evolving where they no longer need men to fight the battles in the field and instead, they’ll be fought by the machines. The cost per weapon will also be much lower and much quicker to build compared to the eight-year construction of aircraft carriers like the USS Gerald R Ford at a cost of $13 billion. The weapons of today are becoming very smart with the assistance of AI and far cheaper to build than in the past. In my opinion defense is not something that the United States wants to go cheap on and I’m glad to see we do spend about $1.1 billion yearly on defense to protect our country. We will still need pilots, but instead of one pilot per plane there are now unmanned collaborative combat aircrafts known as CCA’s where one pilot can command 10 pilotless planes. It appears the industry is changing quickly and I’m happy to report that the United States is in the lead with developing smart weapons. For investors looking at the defense contractors in the United States, there are some big names like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman whose stocks are not too expensive but I also wouldn’t say they are on sale. There are also smaller companies like AeroVironment and San Diego based Kratos Defense and Security Solutions that should continue to grow as the war game changes, but would definitely be riskier investments. Overall, as defense changes, the area of defense contractors should continue to grow. What makes In-N-Out Burger so successful? Many small businesses and probably large businesses as well could learn so much by just going to eat at an In-N-Out Burger. It is probably one of my favorite restaurants and places to go because I always know what I’m going to get and it’s always of high-quality. My wife and I went on a Sunday afternoon around 1 o’clock and there were probably at least 25 cars in the drive-through and inside there were barely any open tables. We were lucky enough to get a table back in the corner, which gave me a full view of some of the things that makes this restaurant company so successful. First, let me give you a little background. The company had sales of $2.1 billion, which was derived from 418 restaurants, of which 280 are in California. The company was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder and is currently owned by the Snyder family and run by the granddaughter, Lynsi Snyder who is owner and president. She is worth about $7 billion. As we sat at that corner table for probably 15 to 20 minutes to eat our lunch, I noticed four times an employee coming by to pick up a piece of paper or any trash on the floor, which was not there for longer than two minutes. I also noticed as soon as someone got up when they were finished eating, within a minute another employee would come by to clean up the table for the next person. You just don’t see that in businesses today. I believe some businesses are too concerned trying to control their labor costs, which comes at the expense of customer service and it seems you won’t find that at In-N-Out Burger. The restaurants are extremely clean and appears to be from what I could see at least 20 to 25 people working there. I have to add I don’t know what the interview process is but all of their employees seem to be very friendly, upbeat and appear to enjoy their job. Since they are a private company, it is only possible to get estimates of the sales of $2.1 billion per year, which comes from producing 61 million hamburgers. They have maintained pretty much the same menu for the last 75 years, which has likely enabled them to focus on quality control to produce great hamburgers and French fries for every order. Ultimately, their service is great, the food is great and I love that they keep it simple, which works very well for many businesses. Their business model is so unique that in 2003 they even became a case study for the Harvard school of business. UK luxury cars are hurting and it likely won’t get any better If you love the British high-end luxury vehicles like Aston Martin, Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Jaguar and Land Rover you may be disappointed that the prices of these vehicles will likely be going even higher. British cars will now have a 10% tariff on them when coming to the US, which is well below the 27.5% rate before the tariffs were implemented, but it is still way higher than before the tariffs began on April 3rd. In 2024 Britain shipped 96,000 cars to the US, which is just under the limit for the 10% tariff of 100,000 vehicles a year. Anything above that the 100,000 limit will see tariffs jump to 25%. Last year Britain made approximately 780,000 cars, which was about the same as 2022, but for 2025 the production is expected to slip by 8 to 10%. I was surprised to learn that of the top 20 car manufacturers in the world, the United Kingdom was 19th. This was below Russia and only beat out Malaysia. I didn’t even know that Malaysia produced cars. Today China is the top producer of cars around the world producing over 30 million cars a year with the United States coming in at just over 10 million and Japan checking in at around 8 million cars produced. The United States is the single biggest market for British luxury cars like Bentley, Range Rover and Aston Martin, but the demand for these British luxury cars is in a state of decline. I guess we need another James Bond movie for people to get excited about driving an Aston Martin.